Effects of cycocel on growth, some physiological traits and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under salt stress

Document Type : Research Paper


Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran


In order to investigate changes in sodium ion (Na+), potassium ion (K+), dry matter mobilization and grain filling period of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under salinity stress, a factorial experiment was conducted based on randomized complete block design with three replications. Factors were salinity at four levels [no-salt (S0) and salinity of 25 (S1), 50 (S2) and 75 (S3) mM NaCl, equivalent of 2.3, 4.61 and 6.92 dS m1, respectively] and four cycocel levels [without cycocel (C0) and application of 400 (C1), 800 (C2) and 1200 (C3) mg L-1 cycocel)]. Results showed that salinity stress decreased grain yield, chlorophyll index, grain filling period, stomata conductance and relative water content in plant shoots. But grain filling rate and dry matter remobilization from shoots increased. Application of cycocel at C3 level led to the reduction of 36.36% and 5.75% in dry matter remobilization from shoot and stem, respectively. In the case of mineral content, Na+/K+ ratio was increased with increasing salinity level. At all salinity levels, cycocel application resulted in lower Na+ content and Na+/K+ ratio. Higher K+ accumulation in the cycocel treated plants, resulted in a low Na+/K+ ratio leading to their efficiency in salinity tolerance. It was concluded that cycocel can be a proper toolfor increasing wheat yield under salinity condition.


Article Title [فارسی]

تاثیر سایکوسل بر برخی صفات فیزیولوژیکی و عملکرد گندم تحت تنش شوری

Authors [فارسی]

  • رئوف سید شریفی
  • راضیه خلیل زاده
دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی
Abstract [فارسی]

 به‌منظور ارزیابی تغییر در یون‌های سدیم (Na+) و پتاسیم (K+)، انتقال مجدد ماده خشک و دوره پر شدن دانه گندم تحت تنش شوری، یک آزمایش فاکتوریل بر پایه طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار اجرا شد. تیمارها شوری خاک در چهار سطح ]بدون اعمال شوری به عنوان شاهد  و شوری 25، 50 و 75 میلی مولار با نمک NaCl به ترتیب معادل3/2، 61/4 و 92/6 دسی‌زیمنس بر متر[، و چهار سطح سایکوسل ]بدون سایکوسل به عنوان شاهد و کاربرد 400، 800 و 1200 میلی‌گرم در لیتر سایکوسل[ را شامل شدند. تنش شوری عملکرد دانه ، شاخص کلروفیل، دوره پر شدن دانه‌، هدایت الکتریکی و محتوای نسبی آب در اندام‌های هوایی گندم را کاهش داد. ولی سرعت پر شدن دانه و انتقال ماده خشک از اندام­های هوایی افزایش یافت. کاربرد 1200 میلی‌گرم در لیتر سایکوسل سهم فرایند انتقال مجدد ماده خشک در اندام هوایی و ساقه را به ترتیب 36/36 و 75/5 درصد کاهش داد. در عوض نسبت سدیم به پتاسیم با افزایش سطح شوری، افزایش یافت. در تمامی سطوح شوری کاربرد سایکوسل محتوای سدیم و نسبت سدیم به پتاسیم را کاهش داد. زیادی انباشتگی پتاسیم در گیاهان تیمار شده با سایکوسل منجر به کاهش نسبت سدیم به پتاسیم و در نتیجه افزایش کارآیی مقاومت این گیاهان به شوری شد. به طور کلی، نتیجه گرفته شد که کاربرد سایکوسل می‌تواند به عنوان یک ابزار مناسب برای افزایش عملکرد گندم در شرایط شوری مورد استفاده قرار گیرد.

Keywords [فارسی]

  • دوره پر شدن دانه
  • سایکوسل
  • گندم
  • نسبت سدیم به پتاسیم
  • هدایت روزنه­ای
Bashan Y and de-Bashan LE, 2010. How the plant growth-promoting bacterium Azospirillum promotes plant growth- a critical assessment. Advances in Agronomy 108: 77-136.
Bernstein N, Shoresh M, XuY and Huang B, 2010. Involvement of the plant antioxidative response in the differential growth sensitivity to salinity of leaves vs. roots during cell development. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 49: 1161-171.
Bora RK and Sarma CM, 2006. Effect of gibberellic acid and cycocel on growth, yield and protein content of pea. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 5: 330-324.
Borrás L and Otegui ME, 2001. Maize kernel weight response to post flowering source-sink ratio. Crop Science 41: 1816-1822.
Borrás L, Slafer GA and Otegui ME, 2004. Seed dry weight response to source-sink manipulations in wheat, maize and soybean: a quantitative reappraisal. Field Crops Research 86: 131-146.
Botella MA, Martinez V, Pardines J and Cerda A, 1997. Salinity induced potassium deficiency in maize plants. Journal of Plant Physiology 150: 200-205.
Ehdaie B, Alloush GA and Waines JG, 2008. Genotypic variation in linear rate of grain growth and contribution of stem reserves to grain yield in wheat. Field Crops Research 106: 34-43.
Fathi A and Jiriaieb M, 2014. Interaction of PGPR and water deficit stress on yield and protein percent in wheat. Advances in Crop Science and Technology 4: 82-90.
Gadallah MAA, 2000. Effects of indole-3-acetic acid and zinc on the growth, osmotic potential and soluble carbon and nitrogen components of soybean plants growing under water deficit. Journal of Arid Environments 44: 451-467.
Gurmani AR, Bano A, Khan SU, Din J and Zhang JL, 2011. Alleviation of salt stress by seed treatment with abscisic acid (ABA), 6-benzylaminopurine (BA) and chlormequat chloride (CCC) optimizes ion and organic matter accumulation and increases yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Australian Journal of Crop Science 5: 1278-1285.
Hamdia ABE, Shaddad MAK and Doaa, MM, 2004. Mechanisms of salt tolerance and interactive effects of Azospirillum brasilense inoculation on maize cultivars grown under salt stress conditions. Plant Growth Regulation 44: 165-174.
Hsu CY, Chao PY, Hu SP and Yang CM, 2013. The antioxidant and free radical scavenging activities of chlorophylls and pheophytins. Food and Nutrition Sciences 4: 1-8.
Hussain M, Malik MA, Farooq M, Ashraf MY and Cheema MA, 2008. Improving drought tolerance by exogenous application of glycinebetaine and salicylic acid in sunflower. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 194: 193-199.
Inoue T, Inanaga S, Sugimoto Y, An P and Eneji AE, 2004. Effect of drought on ear and flag leaf photosynthesis of two wheat cultivars differing in drought resistance.  Photosynthetica 42: 559- 565.
Izadi MH, Rabbani J, Emam Y, Pessarakli M and Tahmasebi A, 2014. Effects of salinity stress on physiological performance of various wheat and barley cultivars. Journal of Plant Nutrition 37: 520–531.
Jifon JL, Sylvertsen JP and Whaley E, 2005. Growth environment and leaf anatomy affect nondestructive estimates of chlorophyll and nitrogen in Citrus sp. leaves. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 130: 152-158.
Karimi G, Ghorbanli M, Heidari H, Khavari Nejad RA and Assareh MH, 2005. The effects of NaCl on growth, water relations, osmolytes and ion content in Kochia prostrata. Biologia Plantarum 49: 301-304.
Katerji N, van Hoorn JW, Hamdy A, Mastrorilli M and Mou Karzel E, 1997. Osmotic adjustment of sugar beets in response to soil salinity and its influence on stomatal conductance, growth and yield. Agricultural Water Management 34: 57-69.
Kumar S and Haripriya K, 2010. Effect of growth retardants on growth, flowering and yield of Nerium. Plant Archives 10: 681-684.
Lawlor DW, 2002. Limitation to photosynthesis in water-stressed leaves: stomata vs. metabolism and the role of ATP.  Annals of Botany 89: 871-885.
Loss SP and Siddique KHM, 1994. Morphological and physiological traits associated with wheat yield increases in Mediterranean environments. Advances in Agronomy 52: 229-276.
Luoranen J, Rikala R and Aphalo PJ, 2002. Effect of CCC and damonozide on growth of silver birch container seedlings during three years after spraying. New Forest 23: 71-80.
Martinez DE, Luquez VM, Bartoli CG and Guiamét JJ, 2003. Persistence of photosynthetic components and photochemical efficiency in ears of water-stressed wheat (Triticum aestivum). Plant Physiology 119: 1-7.
Meloni DA, Gulotta MR and Martinez CA, 2008. Salinity tolerance in Schinopsis quebracho colorado: seed germination, growth, ion relations and metabolic responses. Journal of Arid Environments 72: 1785-1792.
Michihiro W, Lui JCB and Garvalho GC, 1994. Cultivar difference in leaf photosynthesis and grain yield of wheat under soil water deficit conditions. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 63: 339-344.
Munns R and Tester M, 2008. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology 59: 651-681.
Osman AR, 2014. Improving some quantitative and qualitative characteristics of Solidago canadensis "Tara" using cycocel and planting density under drip irrigation and lighting systems. Life Science Journal 11(6): 110-118.
Pakar N, Pirasteh Anosheh H, Emam Y and Pessarakli M, 2015. Barley growth, yield, antioxidant enzymes and ions accumulation affected by PGRs under salinity stress. Journal of Plant Nutrition 39(10): 1372-1379.
Parvaiz A and Satyawati S, 2008. Salt stress and phyto-biochemical responses of plants-a review. Plant Soil and Environment 54: 89-99.
Rademacher W, 2000. Growth retardants: effects on gibberellin biosynthesis and other metabolic pathways. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 51: 501-531.
Reddy AR, Chaitany KV and Vivekanandan MD, 2004. Drought induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. Journal of Plant Physiology 161: 1189-1202.
Sadras VO and Egli DB, 2008. Seed size variation in grain crops: allometric relationships between rate and duration of seed growth. Crop Science 48: 408-416.
Sairam RK, Srivastava GC, Agarwal S and Meena RC, 2005. Differences in antioxidant activity in response to salinity stress in tolerant and susceptible wheat genotypes. Biologia Plantarum 49: 85-89.
Santiveri F, Royo C and Romagosa I, 2002. Patterns of grain filling of spring and winter hexaploid triticales. European Journal of Agronomy 16: 219-230.
Seyed Sharifi R, Khalilzadeh R and Jalilian J, 2016. Effects of biofertilizers and cycocel on some physiological and biochemical traits of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under salinity stress. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 63(3): 308-318.
Sing J, Chen M, Feng G, Jia Y, Wang B and Zhang F, 2009. Effect of salinity on growth, ion accumulation and the roles of ions in osmotic adjustment of two populations of Suaeda salsa. Plant and Soil 314: 133-141.
Tambussi EA, Bort J, Guiamet JJ, Nogués S and Araus JL, 2007. The photosynthetic role of ears in C3 cereals: metabolism, water use efficiency and contribution to grain yield. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 26: 1-16.
Tammam A, Abou Alhamd MF and Hemeda M, 2008. Study of salt tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestium L.) cultivar Banysoif 1. Australian Journal of Crop Science 1: 115-125.
Tuna AL, Kaya C, Dikilitas M and Higgs D, 2008. The combined effects of gibberellic acid and salinity on some antioxidant enzyme activities, plant growth parameters and nutritional status in maize plants. Environmental and Experimental Botany 62: 1-9.
Turner NC, 1997. Further progress in crop water relations. Advances in Agronomy 58: 293-338.
Upadhyay SK, Singh JS, Saxena AK and Singh DP, 2012. Impact of PGPR inoculation on growth and antioxidant status of wheat under saline conditions. Plant Biology 14: 605- 611.
Véry AA, Robinson MF, Mansfield TA and Sanders D, 1998. Guard cell cation channels are involved in Na+-induced stomatal closure in a halophyte. Plant Journal 14: 509-521.
Wang HQ, Li HS, Liu FL and Xiao LT, 2009. Chlorocholine chloride application effects on photosynthetic capacity and photoassimilates partitioning in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Scientia Horticulturae 119: 113-116.
Wang HQ and Xiao LT, 2009. Effects of chlorocholine chloride on phytohormones and photosynthetic characteristics in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 28: 21-27.
Wang H, Xiaoa L, Tonga J and Liu G, 2010. Foliar application of chlorocholine chloride improves leaf mineral nutrition, antioxidant enzyme activity, and tuber yield of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Scientia Horticulturae 125: 521-523.
Xue Q, Zhu Z, Musick JT, Stewart BA and Dusek DA, 2006. Physiological mechanisms contributing to the increased water-use efficiency in winter wheat under deficit irrigation. Journal of Plant Physiology 163: 154-164.
Yamaguchi T and Blumwald E, 2005. Developing salt-tolerant crop plants: challenges and opportunities. Trends in Plant Sciences 10(12): 615-620.
Yang JC, Zhang JH, Wang ZQ, Zhu QS and Liu LJ, 2003. Involvement of abscisic acid and cytokinins in the senescence and remobilization of carbon reserves in wheat subjected to water stress during grain filling. Plant Cell and Environment 26: 1621-1631.
Yordanov I, Velikova V and Tsonev T, 2000. Plant responses to drought, acclimation, and stress tolerance. Photosynthetica 38: 171-186.