Relationship Between Ion Accumulation and Plant Biomass of Alfalfa Under Salt Stress

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

Abstract
Salinity is one of the major abiotic challenges influencing plant productivity worldwide. To examine the response of two alfalfa cultivars (Bami and Hamedani) to six levels of water salinity (0, 25, 50, 75, 100, 125 mM L-1 NaCl), a glasshouse experiment was conducted at the College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran in 2008. The results showed that in Bami (which appeared to be more tolerant to salinity), with increasing salt stress from 75 to 125 mM L-1, dry weight per pot was significantly decreased from 15.1 to 10.3 g, while in Hamedani decrease in dry weight was started from 50 mM L-1 salinity level. In both Bami and Hamedani cultivars leaf area per pot was significantly decreased when salt stress was higher than 75 mM   L-1. There was a significant difference in leaf relative water content (RWC) between the two alfalfa cultivars in 75, 100 and 125 mM L-1 NaCl salinity levels. With increase in salinity level, the Na+ concentration was increased from 220 to 565 mmol kg-1 dry weight in Bami, and from 238 to 643 mmol kg-1 dry weight in Hamedani. The Cl- concentration in Hamedani (622 mmol kg-1 dry weight in 125 mM L-1 NaCl) was higher than that in Bami (503 mmol kg-1 dry weight in 125 mM L-1 NaCl). The K+ concentration was increased from 203 to 604 mmol kg-1 dry weight in Bami, and from 135 to 571 mmol kg-1 dry weight in Hamedani. Furthermore, phytomass production in Bami was significantly correlated with K+ (r=0.97), and Ca2+ (r=0.96) concentrations, as well as with leaf area (r=0.50) and plant height (r=0.87). Path analysis showed that there were significant direct effects of leaf area (p=0.73), Ca2+ (p=1.02) and K+ (p=0.59) on dry weight in Bami. In Hamedani, there were significant direct effects of K+ (p=0.61) and Ca2+ (p=1.07 on dry weight. Overall, based on both correlation and path analyses, it was concluded that measurements of K+ and Ca2+ concentrations may be appropriate criteria for evaluating susceptibility of cultivars to salt stress. These results may also be used for screening the salt resistant cultivars of alfalfa.
 

Keywords


Introduction

One of the most important limiting factors which can cause major loss in crop productivity is soil and water salinization (Munns 2002; Ahmadi et al. 2009; Emam et al. 2009; Sadeghi and Emam 2006). Salt affected lands, which is around 7% of the world’s land area, i.e. 930  million ha (Ashraf and Orooj 2006), are generally less productive and less profitable for salt-sensitive and often more valuable forage crops such as alfalfa (Djilianov et al. 2003). In Fars province of Iran, salt stress is considered to be a growing problem in irrigated agricultural areas with low water quality and poor soil drainage (Sadeghi and Emam 2006). In these areas, where the rainfall is often low, cropping of salt tolerant cultivars will allow crops to extract more water.

Cordivilla et al. (1999) reported that in legumes, increase in salt stress level, greater than 50 mM L-1 NaCl, was associated with decrease in growth and productivity. Hashemi and Hajrasuliha (2001) found that some alfalfa cultivars (Ranger and Rahnani) produced more dry weight and leaf area, compared with other cultivars (Maopa and Yazdi), under salinity levels greater than 50 mM L-1 NaCl. Safanejad et al. (1996) reported that there was a strong positive relationship between dry weight and RWC in alfalfa under salt stress conditions. Vaughan et al. (2002) declared that in MnPl-9-LF and MnPl-9-HF cultivars of alfalfa, with increasing salt stress from 70 to 300 mM L-1 NaCl a respective decline of 36 to 87% in dry weight production was occurred.  

Salinity inhibits plant growth due to water deficit and or ion-excess effects (Munns et al. 2006), while higher amounts of sodium (Na+) in plant tissue is toxic, but potassium (K+) is essential to the plants. The cytosol of plant cells normally contains 100-200 mM L-1 of K+ and 1-10 mM L-1 of Na+. Under the typical salt stress conditions, accumulation of high Na+/K+ disrupts enzymatic functions that are normally activated in cells (Munns 2002; Munns et al. 2006). Under salt stress, it is important for cells to maintain a low concentration of Na+ or to maintain a high K+/Na+ ratio in the cytosol (Maathuis and Amtmann 1999). Plant cells that maintained higher K+/Na+ and Ca2+/Na+ ratios in the shoots, can function normally under saline conditions (Jones 2001). Ashraf and Orooj (2006) reported that the maintenance of higher K+/Na+ and Ca2+/Na+ ratios in shoots by ajowain (Trachyspermum ammi L.) could be an important component of its salt tolerance. Gholipor et al. (2004) showed that under salt stress conditions, the Kabuli cultivars of chickpea had lower K+ and Ca2+ concentrations and K+/Na+ ratio and their dry weights decreased with increasing salinity level. 

The major global problems with soil and salinity is caused by human activities, and Na+ and Cl- are the ions that are responsible for the plant yield losses (Ashraf and Orooj 2006; Ahmadi et al. 2009). Osmotic potential of the soil increases, when NaCl as well as other soil ions accumulate, and this obstructs the uptake of water by the plants. Further perturbations of plant metabolism occur when toxic ions such as Na+ or Cl- enter the plant cell (Suyama et al. 2007; Da Silva and Nogueira 2008).

The aim of this research was to examine the vegetative growth, ion accumulation and biomass production of two alfalfa cultivars under salinity stress and also to clarify the relationship between ion accumulation and biomass production of two alfalfa cultivars using correlation and path analyses.

 

Materials and Methods

In order to examine the effects of sodium chloride on vegetative growth and ions accumulation in two alfalfa cultivars (Bami and Hamedani), a greenhouse experiment was conducted during Spring and Summer 2008. Bami is a late season cultivar, with a plant height of up to 100 cm, high yield potential and vertical growth habit, which is adapted to temperate and semi-tropical environments of FarsProvince. Hamedani is an intermediate season cultivar, with a plant height of up to 75 cm, medium yield potential and prostrate growth habit, which is adapted to cold and temperate environments of FarsProvince (Bahrani 2000). The experiment was carried out at College of Agriculture, ShirazUniversity, Shiraz, Iran, on a fine mixed, mesic Typic Calcixerpets soil. There were six levels of salinity (i.e. control, 25, 50, 75, 100, and 125 mM L-1 NaCl). The temperature range was 25 to 30° C, with 70 to 80% relative humidity throughout the experiment. The light intensity was in the range of 600-1000 µmol m-2 s-1. The experiment was arranged as completely randomized design with four replications. Physico-chemical properties of soil before sowing was as: sand, silt, and clay= 7, 67.6 and 25.4%, respectively, organic matter content= 0.91%, pH=7.1, EC=0.05 dS/m, total nitrogen=0.09%, phosphorous= 16.1 mg kg-1 and potassium= 463 mg kg-1.

Alfalfa seeds were sown in 5 kg plastic pots filled with soil fertilized with 20, 25 and 10 mg kg-1 NPK, respectively. Before sowing, some gravel (5 to 10 mm) was put at the bottom of each pot to allow drainage. Fifty seeds were sown in each pot on April 28th 2008, and then thinned to twenty seedlings at the two-leaf stage and harvested at 10% flowering on July 3rd 2008. When the plants were at the two-leaf stage, salt treatments were applied. The pots were irrigated every five days up to field capacity and the EC of the soil in each pot was measured before and after each irrigation, using a portable EC meter (Model Scout 1010, UK).

Leaf area per pot was measured at harvest using a leaf area meter (Model 3000, LI-COR Inc.: Lincoln, NE) 67 days after NaCl treatment. At harvest, the forages were cut, rinsed briefly in de-ioinized water to remove surface salts and dust, weighted and samples were dried in an oven at 72° C for 48 hours, to determine dry weights. The dried tissues were ground to pass a 1 mm mesh in a Thomas-Wiley laboratory mill for Na+, K+ and Ca2+ quantification. The contents of Na+, K+ and Ca2+ were then determined using a flame photometer (Model Jenway PFP-7). Chloride was measured by titration after samples were oven-dried and ground material was extracted in de-mineralized water for 30 min (Chen et al. 2001). The leaf relative water content (RWC) was calculated according to Beadle et al. (1993) using the following equation:

RWC = [(FW - DW/((TW-DW)] × 100

where FW is the fresh weight, DW is the dry weight and TW is the turgid weight. The data were subjected to analysis of variance, and the means were compared using Duncan's multiple range test (p 0.05). Path and correlation analyses were done using SAS (2000).

 

Results and Discussion

Analysis of variance: Based on Table 1, ion accumulation, dry weight, leaf area, plant height and RWC were significantly affected by alfalfa cultivars and salt stress. Interactions of cultivar × salt stress for Na+, Ca2+ and Cl- accumulations, dry weight, leaf area and RWC were also significant (Table 1).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source of variations

Degrees of freedom

K+

Na +

Ca++

Cl-

Dry weight/pot

Leaf area/pot

Height

%RWC

Cultivar

1

23999.2 *

6916.7 **

930.25**

37249.0*

148.03**

210834.0**

42.25**

1560.25**

Salt Stress

5

196891.5**

180770.1*

425.25*

151444.6**

113.69**

66313.9*

102.85**

1676.02**

Cultivar × Salt

5

1356. 8ns

2954.1**

45.25**

4823.8**

0.62*

7968.5 *

2.05ns

56.91**

Error

36

1748.9

5.5

13.58

0.0135

0.77

52931.5

0.91

1.38

 

Table 1. Analysis of variance for measured traits of two alfalfa cultivars under salinity stress conditions

 

 

ns,* and  ** : not significant and significant at 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels, respectively.

RWC= Relative Water Content

 

 

Effect of salt stress on vegetative characteristics and RWC of alfalfa

In Bami, with increasing salt stress from 75 to 125 mM L-1, dry weight per pot was significantly decreased from 15.1 g/pot to 10.3 g/pot, while in Hamedani this decrease was started from 50 mM L-1, indicating that Bami might be more tolerant to salinity than Hamedani (Table 2). These results are in agreement with those of Hashemi and Hajrasuliha (2001) who found that in alfalfa, increasing salt stress levels greater than 200 mM L-1 killed the plants due to toxicity effects of NaCl. Suyama et al. (2007) also reported that due to poor salt tolerance of alfalfa, increase in salt stress levels (greater than 100 mM L-1) was associated with plant dry weight reduction. Similar findings have been reported by Emam et al. (2009).

In both Bami and Hamedani cultivars leaf area was significantly decreased when salt stress levels exceeded 75 mM L-1 (Table 2). Again, Bami, which appeared to be more tolerant, had greater leaf area (Table 2).  Djovic et al. (2003) found that at higher salt stress levels (more than 75 mM L-1) leaf area of alfalfa was decreased dramatically. In both alfalfa cultivars, plant height was reduced by salt stress, however, such reduction was greater in Hamedani (Table 2). In a similar study, Vaughan et al. (2002) declared that the long term irrigation of alfalfa with saline water of more than 70 mM L-1 should not be recommended, due to sharp decrease in the root growth, plant height and phytomass production.

There was a significant difference in RWC between the two cultivars at 75 to 125 mM NaCl salinity levels (Table 2) and Bami (i.e. the tolerant cultivar) had greater RWC than Hamedani under all salinity levels. Workers have attributed the variation in RWC between the alfalfa cultivars, when plants were exposed to salt stress, into genetic variations (Jones 2001; Emam et al. 2009). Safanejad et al. (1996) reported that Salado alfalfa cultivar with higher RWC was more tolerant to salinity stress compared to other cultivars with lower RWC. Annad et al. (2000) declared that an increase in salinity level from 25 to 250 mM  L-1 decreased the RWC from 38 to 3%.  Also, a strong positive relationships between leaf area and RWC for both Bami (R2=0.96) and Hamedani (R2=0.95) cultivars were found under salinity conditions (Figure 1). In addition, Bami with higher RWC had greater dry weight and leaf area, compared to Hamedani under each salinity level (Table 2).

 

 

Table 2. Effect of NaCl on dry weight, leaf area, plant height and relative water content (RWC) of two alfalfa cultivars

 

Treatment

 

Dry weight  (g/pot)

 

Leaf area

(cm2/pot)

 

Height

 (cm)

 

 

 

RWC

(%)

 

 

 

Cultivar

Salinity

(mM L-1)

 

 

Bami

0

25

50

75

100

125

21.6a

20.1ab

19.3b

15.1d

13.1e

10.3fg

912a

906a

776b

607c

489d

305e

22.1a

22.2a

21.3ab

20.1b

16.4c

13.2d

 

87.6a

86.5a

85.3a

66.0c

60.0d

48.7f

 

 

 

Hamedani

0

25

50

75

100

125

17.2c

17.3c

14.5de

11.0f

9.1g

6.4h

711b

715b

469d

313e

213f

189f

21.0ab

20.6b

20.5b

17.4c

14.3d

9.1e

 

79.2b

78.3b

76.3b

52.1e

48.6f

35.2g

 

In each column means followed by the similar letters are not significantly different using Duncan's multiple range test (p 0.05

 

 

Figure 1. Relationship between leaf area and leaf relative water content (RWC)

under salinity treatments for two alfalfa cultivars

 

 

 

Effect of salt stress on ion accumulation of alfalfa

Generally, in both cultivars, K+ and Ca2+ concentrations of the foliage were decreased with increase in salt stress levels (Figures 2a and 2b). In Bami, K+ and Ca2+ concentrations were higher than Hamedani under all stress levels. Jones (2001) suggested that the role of K+ accumulation is more important than Ca2+ for cell growth and enzymatic activation under salt stress conditions. The Na+ concentration was increased from 220 to 565 mmol kg-1 dry weight in Bami, and from 238 to 643 mmol kg-1 dry weight in Hamedani (Figure 2c). Also, with increase in salinity level, Cl- concentration in Hamedani  (622 mmol kg-1 dry weight at 125 mM L-1 NaCl) was higher than Bami (503 mmol kg-1 dry weight at 125 mM L-1 NaCl) (Figure 2d). Maathuis and Amtmann (1999) reported that it is very vital for plant cells to keep a low concentration of Na+ and Cl- and high concentration of K+ and Ca2+ when exposed to salt stress. Similar results have been reported by other workers (e.g. Emam et al. 2009). Also, Bami was able to accumulate lower amount of Na+ and Cl- and higher amount of K+ and Ca2+ than Hamedani (Figure 2).

 

Correlation

Results showed that in Bami, there were highly significant positive correlations between alfalfa dry weight and K+ concentration (r=0.97), Ca2+ concentration (r=0.96), leaf area (r=0.50), alfalfa height (r=0.87) and RWC (r=0.98) (Table 3). On the other hand, there were significant negative correlations of alfalfa dry weight with Na+ concentration (r=-0.91) and Cl- concentration (r=-0.96) (Table 3). Results also revealed that in Hamedani, dry weight per pot was significantly correlated with K+ (r=0.91), Ca2+ (r=0.95), leaf area (r=0.46) and RWC (r=0.98) (Table 4), while there was significant negative correlation between alfalfa dry weight and Na+ (r=-0.95) and Cl- (r=-0.98). These correlations confirmed the negative role of   Cl- and Na+ in phytomass production of alfalfa.

In Bami, negative correlations between K+ and Na+ (r=-0.96), K+ andCl- (r=-0.97), Ca2+ and Na+ (r=-0.88) and Ca2+ andCl- (r=-0.99) were obtained (Table 3). Similar trends were observed for ion concentration in Hamedani (Table 4). It is worthy to note that according to Samonte et al. (1997), use of simple correlations may not be efficient for breeding purposes.

 

Path analysis

Based on path analysis in Bami, there were positive path coefficients, direct effects, between alfalfa shoot dry weight and leaf area (p=0.73), Ca2+ (p=1.02) and K+ (p=0.59) (Figure 3a). In Hamedani, there were positive significant path coefficients between dry weight per pot and K+ (p= 0.61) and Ca2+ (p=1.07), while a negative significant direct effect was found between alfalfa dry weight per pot and Na+ (p=-1.01) and K+ andCl- (p=-0.89) (Figure 3b). Many researchers have used path and correlation analyses in breeding programs of fodder oat (Avena sativa L.) (Bukhari et al. 2009),  rice (Oryza sativa L.) (Rabiei et al. 2004), Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) (Alishah et al. 2008) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) (Hui et al. 2008).

 

 

 

 

           (a)

 

 

            (b)

 

 

         (c)

 

 

           (d)

 

 

 

Figure 2. Effect of NaCl levels on K+ (a), Ca2+ (b), Na+ (c) and Cl- concentrations (d) of two alfalfa cultivars

(Means followed by similar letters are not significantly different using Duncan's multiple range tests, p 0.05).


Table 3. Correlation coefficients of measured traits for Bami cultivar

 

K+

Na +

Ca++

Cl-

Leaf area/pot

Dry weight/pot

Height

RWC

K+

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Na +

-0.96**

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ca2+

0.96*

-0.88*

1

 

 

 

 

 

Cl-

-0.97**

0.89**

-0.99**

1

 

 

 

 

Leaf area/pot

0.40*

-0.35

0.39*

-0.40

1

 

 

 

Dry weight/pot

0.97**

-0.91**

0.96**

-0.96**

0.50*

1

 

 

Height

0.94*

-0.95*

0.88*

-0.89*

0.23*

0.87**

1

 

RWC

0.98*

-0.91*

0.99*

-0.99*

0.45**

0.98**

0.90*

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

* and ** significant at 0.05 and 0.01 probability level, respectively

RWC= Relative Water Content

 

 

In this study, there was a highly significant simple correlation of alfalfa dry weight with plant height in both cultivars (Tables 3 and 4), with Na+ in Bami cultivar (Table 3) and with K+ in Hamedani cultivar (Table 4). However, path coefficients were not significant for these traits in each cultivar (Figures 3 a and b), indicating that selection based on simple correlations may not be efficient as also reported by others (e.g., Samonte et al. 1997; Gravvois and Foyer 2002). The results of path and correlation analyses might be different since the two analyses evaluate different parameters (Campbell et al. 1980). Correlation measures mutual associations between variables, while path analysis shows relative importance of the association (Bukhari et al. 2009).

Generally, Bami had higher dry weight per pot, leaf area and plant height compared to Hamedani under salt stress conditions. Also, Bami with higher RWC had greater dry weight per pot than Hamedani. In addition, under salt stress levels greater than 75 mM L-1, vegetative characteristics of both cultivars decreased significantly. Bami was able to maintain lower amount of Na+ and Cl- and higher amount of K+ and Ca2+ than Hamedani. It appeared that Na+ had toxic and negative effect on plant growth and ion balance, especially in Hamedani cultivar, under high salt stress. It was also concluded that evaluation of alfalfa cultivars based on both path and simple correlation coefficients might be more reliable than simple correlation alone.

 

          (a)                                                                                             (b)

 

P=0.73*

LA

                                                                                   

LA

Ca2+

Cl-

P=0.61**

P=1.07**

P=-0.89**

Ca2+

P=1.02**

Dry

weight

 

Na+

P=-1.01**

    Dry weight

K+

P=0.59**

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 3. Diagram of path coefficients between dry weight and some measured traits in Bami

(a) and Hamedani (b) cultivars

Table 4. Correlation coefficients of measured traits for Hamedani cultivar

 

 

K+

Na +

Ca++

Cl-

Leaf area/pot

Dry weight/pot

Height

RWC

K+

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Na +

-0.96**

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ca2+

0.92*

-0.97**

1

 

 

 

 

 

Cl-

-0.95*

0.97*

-0.95**

1

 

 

 

 

Leaf area/pot

0.41**

-0.38

0.38

-0.42

1

 

 

 

Dry weight/pot

0.91**

-0.95**

0.95**

-0.98**

0.46**

1

 

 

Height

0.92**

-0.95*

0.92*

-0.95*

0.30*

0.91**

1

 

RWC

0.87*

-0.90**

0.91*

-0.96*

0.46**

0.98*

0.88*

1

* and ** significant at 0.05 and 0.01 probability level, respectively

RWC= Relative Water Content

Ahmadi A, Emam Y and Pessarakli M, 2009. Responses of various cultivars of wheat and maize to salinity stress. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment 7: 123-128.
Alishah O, Bagherieh-Najjar MB and Fahmideh L, 2008. Correlation, path coefficient and factor analysis of some quantitative and agronomic traits in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Asian Journal of Biological Science 1: 61-68.
Anand A, Baig MJ and Mandal PK, 2000. Response of alfalfa genotypes to saline water irrigation. Biologia Plantarum 43: 455-457. 
Ashraf M and Orooj A, 2006. Salt stress effects on growth, ion accumulation and seed oil concentration in an arid zone traditional medicinal plant ajwain (Trachyspermum ammi L.). Journal of Arid Environment 64: 209–220.
Bahrani MJ, 2000. Forage Production. ShirazUniversityPub., Iran, 198 pp.
Beadle CL, Ludlow MM and Honeysett JL, 1993. Water Relations. Chapman & Hall, London, UK, 301 pp.
Bukhari SA, Bhat Bilal A and Maqbool S, 2009. Correlation and path coefficient analysis in fodder oat (Avena sativa L.). Journal of Life Sciences 6: 36-44.
Campbell WF, Wagenet RJ, Bamatraf AM and Turner DL, 1980. Path coefficient analysis of correlation between stress and barley yield components. Agronomy Journal 72: 1012–1016.
Chen S, Li L, Wang S, Hu S and Altman A, 2001. Salt nutrient uptake and transport, and ABA of Populus euphratica; a hybrid in response to increasing soil NaCl. Trees 15: 186–194.
Cordovilla MD, Ligero F and Liuch C, 1999. Effects of NaCl on growth and nitrogen fixation and assimilation of inoculated and KNO3 fertillized Vicia faba L. and Pisum sativum L. plants. Plant Science 140: 127-136.
Da Silva EC and Nogueira RJ, 2008. Physiological responses to salt stress in young umbu plants. Environmental and Experimental Botany 63: 147-157.
 Djilianov D, Prinsen E, Oden S and Muller J, 2003. Effect of salt stress on alfalfa lines obtained after in vitro selection for osmotic tolerance. Plant Science 165: 887-894.
Emam Y, Bijanzadeh E, Naderi R, and Edalat M, 2009. Effect of salt stress on vegetative growth and ion accumulation of two alfalfa (L.) cultivars. Desert 14: 163-169.
Gholipor M, Rahimzadeh-Khoii F, Ghasemi K and Moghadam M, 2004. Effects of salinity on chickpea cultivars at heterotrophic stage. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources 10: 97-107 (In Persian with English abstract).
Gravois, M and Foyer CH, 2002. Common components, network and pathway of cross tolerance to stress. The central role of redox and abscisic acid-mediated controls. Plant Physiology 129: 460-468.
Hashemi SM and Hajrasoliha S, 2001. Study of salt tolerance in alfalfa varieties. Soil Water Science 15: 90-98.
Hiu Z, Zhang Z, Hong Ping S and Foulkes MJ,  2008. Genetic correlation and path analysis of transpiration efficiency for wheat flag leaves. Environmental and Experimental Botany 64:128–134.
Jones RG, 2001. Salt Tolerance and Physiological Processes Limiting Plant Productivity. Butterworths, London, UK, 471 pp.
Maathuis FJ  and Amtmann A, 1999. K+ nutrition and Na+ toxicity, the basis of cellular K+/Na+ ratios. Annals of Botany 84: 123-133.
Munns R, 2002. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant, Cell and Environment 25: 239-250.
Munns R,  James AJ and Lauchli A, 2006. Approaches to increasing the salt tolerance of wheat and other cereals. Journal of Experimental Botany 57: 1025-1043.
Rabiei B, Valizadeh M, Ghareyazie B and Moghaddam M, 2004. Evaluation of selection indices for improving rice grain shape. Field Crops Research 89: 359–367.
 Sadeghi H and Emam Y, 2006. Effect of different sodium chloride levels on morphological characteristics, chemical composition and yield components of two bread wheat cultivars. Desert 10: 267-278.
Safanejad A, Collin HA, Bruce KD and McNeilly T, 1996. Characterization of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) following in vitro selection for salt tolerance. Euphytica 92: 55-61. Samonte L, Polignano GB and Dixon MA, 1997. Stomatal resistance of three potato cultivars as influenced by soil water status, humidity and irradiance. PotatoResearch 40: 47-57.
SAS Institute, 2000. SAS Users’ Guide. SAS Ins., Cary, NC.
Suyama H, Benes SE, Robinson PH, Grattan SR, Grieve CM and Getachew G, 2007. Forage yield and quality under irrigation with saline drainage water: greenhouse evaluation. Agriculture Water Management 88: 159-172.
VaughanLV, MacAdam JW, Smith SE and Dudley LM, 2002. Root growth and yield of differing alfalfa rooting populations under increasing salinity and zero leaching. Crop Science 42: 2064-2071.