Impact of drought stress and rootstock on growth, compatible osmolytes, and flavonoids of Daphnis tomato

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Horticultural Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Iran

2 PhD student, Department of Horticultural Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Iran

Abstract

Greenhouse vegetable production faces challenges in regions prone to drought and water shortages. Grafting offers opportunities to enhance performance under stress conditions. This study evaluated the growth and biochemical responses of Daphnis tomato grafted onto different rootstocks under different irrigation levels. In a greenhouse experiment, seven Solanaceous rootstocks were used and the plants were subjected to three irrigation regimes (3-day interval as control, and 6-day and 9-day intervals as moderate and severe drought stresses) for four months. Results showed significant effects of irrigation intervals and rootstocks on growth and biochemical characteristics. Increasing irrigation interval led to the reduction in shoot fresh weight (SHFW), root length (RL), and yield. Certain rootstocks (Solanum cheesmaniae, S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme) outperformed others in SHFW, RL, and yield. Also, rootstocks influenced the accumulation of total phenolic compounds (TPC), total soluble carbohydrates (TSC), and total flavonoid content (TFC). S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme and S. cheesmaniae showed the lowest levels of these compounds. The interaction of irrigation intervals with rootstocks was significant for root fresh weight, shoot-to-root ratio, and leaf proline content. S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme and S. cheesmaniae maintained root biomass under severe drought stress, while S. nigrum exhibited efficient resource allocation to the shoots under severe drought stress. Leaf proline content increased under severe drought stress in specific rootstocks. In conclusion, the type of rootstock influenced the growth and biochemical characteristics of the Daphnis tomato under water-deficit stress conditions. S. cheesmaniae, and S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme demonstrated better growth, while certain rootstocks exhibited higher levels of biochemical compounds. These findings emphasize the importance of rootstock selection for enhancing drought tolerance in tomato cultivation and show the significance of some biochemical compounds in determining the water status of the greenhouse tomato.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Aftab T, Khan MMA, Naeem M. 2011. Effects of proline, salicylic acid, and calcium on antioxidant enzymes activity of wheat under water stress. J Plant Interact. 6(4): 229-236.
Al Hassan M, Fuertes MM, Sanchez FJR, Vicente O, Boscaiu M. 2015. Effects of salt and water stress on plant growth and on accumulation of osmolytes and antioxidant compounds in cherry tomato. Not Bot Horti Agrobot Cluj Napoca. 43(1): 1-11.
Alves FM, Joshi M, Djidonou D, Joshi V, Gomes CN, Leskovar DI. 2021. Physiological and biochemical responses of tomato plants grafted onto Solanum pennellii and Solanum peruvianum under water-deficit conditions. Plants. 10(11): 2236.
Araus JL, Slafer GA, Reynolds MP, Royo C. 2002. Plant breeding and drought in C3 cereals: what should we breed for? Ann Bot. 89 (7): 925-940.
Bai Y, Lindhout P. 2007. Domestication and breeding of tomatoes: what have we gained and what can we gain in the future? Ann Bot. 100: 1085-1094.
Bates LS, Waldren RP, Tear ID. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant Soil. 56: 205-207.
Bharathi S, Pugalendhi L, Priya RS, Uma D, Tamilselvi NA. 2021. Grafting studies of tomato with wild Solanum rootstocks. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 10(1): 2210-2213.
Chaves MM, Flexas J, Pinheiro C. 2009. Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Ann Bot. 103(4): 551-560.
Conti V, Mareri L, Faleri C, Nepi M, Romi M, Cai G, Cantini C. 2019. Drought stress affects the response of Italian local tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) varieties in a genotype-dependent manner. Plants. 8(9): 336.
Cortez-Madrigal H, Ochoa-Alejo N, Ruíz-Medrano R. 2012. Effect of Solanum rootstocks on growth, yield, and flavor of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruits. HortScience. 47: 697-702.
Eziz A, Yan Z, Tian D, Han W, Tang Z, Fang J. 2017. Drought effect on plant biomass allocation: a meta‐analysis. Ecol Evol. 7(24): 11002-11010.
Gharibi S, Tabatabaei BES, Saeidi G, Talebi M, Matkowski A. 2019. The effect of drought stress on polyphenolic compounds and expression of flavonoid biosynthesis related genes in Achillea pachycephala Rech. f. Phytochemistry. 162: 90-98.
Irigoyen JJ, Einerich DW, Sánchez‐Díaz M. 1992. Water stress induced changes in concentrations of proline and total soluble sugars in nodulated alfalfa (Medicago sativa) plants. Physiol Plant. 84(1): 55-60.
Khan MIR, Asgher M, Khan NA, Fatma M. 2018. Antioxidant defense system and proline accumulation enables hot pepper to perform better under drought. Sci Hortic. 238: 144-152.
Kumar P, Rouphael Y, Cardarelli M, Colla G. 2017. Vegetable grafting as a tool to improve drought resistance and water use efficiency. Front Plant Sci. 8: 1130.
Kusvuran, S, Kirnak H, and Copur O. 2019. Water stress induced changes in growth, some biochemical parameters and peroxidase activity in four different tomato genotypes. Int J Agric Biol. 21(3): 553-558.
Li B, Fan R, Sun G, Sun T, Fan Y, Bai S, Guo S, Huang S, Liu J, Zhang H, et al. 2021. Flavonoids improve drought tolerance of maize seedlings by regulating the homeostasis of reactive oxygen species. Plant Soil. 461: 389-405.
Lopes MM, Mendonça D. 2016. Grafting as a sustainable strategy for growing tomatoes under salinity stress. Sci Hortic. 213: 319-327.
McDonald S, Prenzler PD, Antolovich M, Robards K. 2001. Phenolic content and antioxidant activity of olive extracts. Food Chem. 73: 73‑84.
Martínez JP, Silva HFLJ, Ledent JF, Pinto M. 2007. Effect of drought stress on the osmotic adjustment, cell wall elasticity and cell volume of six cultivars of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Eur J Agron. 26(1): 30-38.
Rai AC, Singh M, Shah K. 2012. Effect of water withdrawal on formation of free radical, proline accumulation and activities of antioxidant enzymes in ZAT12-transformed transgenic tomato plants. Plant Physiol Biochem. 61: 108-114.
Sánchez-Rodríguez E, Moreno DA, Ferreres F, del Mar Rubio-Wilhelmi M, Ruiz JM. 2011. Differential responses of five cherry tomato varieties to water stress: changes on phenolic metabolites and related enzymes. Phytochemistry. 72(8): 723-729.
Sobeih WY, Dodd IC, Bacon MA, Grierson D, Davies WJ. 2004. Long‐distance signals regulating stomatal conductance and leaf growth in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) plants subjected to partial rootzone drying. J Exp Bot. 55(407): 2353-2363.
Vurukonda SSKP, Vardharajula S, Shrivastava M, SkZ A. 2016. Enhancement of drought stress tolerance in crops by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Microbiol Res. 184: 13-24.
Wang Z, Yang Y, Yadav V, Zhao W, He Y, Zhang X, Wei C. 2022. Drought-induced proline is mainly synthesized in leaves and transported to roots in watermelon under water deficit. Hortic Plant J. 8(5): 615-626.
Zhishen J, Mengcheng T, Jianming W. 1999. The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food Chem. 64: 555-559.
Zhou R, Kong L, Yu X, Ottosen CO, Zhao T, Jiang F, Wu Z. 2019. Oxidative damage and antioxidant mechanism in tomatoes responding to drought and heat stress. Acta Physiol Plant. 41: 1-11.
Journal of Plant Physiology and Breeding
Volume 13, Issue 2
December 2023
Pages 261-275

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics