Introduction of Attar a new early-ripening sweet cherry cultivar with suitable fruit quality

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Crop and Horticultural Science Research Department, Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Mashhad, Iran

2 Horticultural Science Research Institute, AREEO, Karaj, Iran

3 Department of Agriculture, Technical and Engineering Faculty, Velayat University, Iranshahr, Iran

Abstract

Introducing new sweet cherry cultivars with early ripening time is one of the most important goals of cherry breeding programs in Iran. The Attar cultivar was selected from the native sweet cherry germplasms of the Khorasan Razavi province by implementing eight research projects for 21 years since 1998. Evaluation of the vegetative, reproductive, and pomological characteristics of the genotypes along with other cultivars during 2005-2020 led to the introduction of the Attar cultivar. The results showed that Attar had semi-spreading tree habits with a moderate degree of branching. The time of the first flowering for Attar was in the second week of April. Results showed that this cultivar was self-incompatible. Siyah-e-Mashhad, Sweet Heart, and Dovomras-e-Mashhad cultivars were suitable pollinizers for the Attar cultivar. The harvesting time of Attar was in the first week of June. The average fruit weight of the Attar cultivar (7.73 g) was higher than those of the Shandiz (7.23 g) and Toos (6.87 g) cultivars. Also, the total soluble solids in Attar (19.87%) were higher than the Shandiz (16.63%) and Toos (17.13%) cultivars. The fruit yield of Attar in the economic fruiting stage was 40 kg per tree, which was higher than the Shandiz cultivar (22.43 kg). Fruit cracking disorder in the Attar cultivar was lower than other cultivars. Attar has a high economic value and therefore the development of this cherry cultivar can play an important role in increasing the income of cherry producers.

Keywords


Article Title [Persian]

معرفی عطار رقم جدید گیلاس زودرس با کیفیت میوه مناسب

Authors [Persian]

  • ابراهیم گنجی مقدم 1
  • ناصر بوذری 2
  • محبوبه زمانی پور زمانی پور 3
1 بخش تحقیقات علوم زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خراسان رضوی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، مشهد.
2 موسسه تحقیقات علوم باغبانی، کرج
3 گروه کشاورزی، دانشکده فنی و مهندسی، دانشگاه ولایت ایرانشهر، ایرانشهر
Abstract [Persian]

معرفی ارقام جدید گیلاس زودرس یکی از مهم­ترین اهداف برنامه های پرورش گیلاس در ایران است. رقم عطار با اجرای هشت طرح تحقیقاتی به مدت 21 سال از سال 1377 از ژرم پلاسم­ های گیلاس بومی خراسان رضوی انتخاب شد. ارزیابی ویژگی ­های رویشی، زایشی و پومولوژیکی ژنوتیپ ­­ها به همراه سایر ارقام طی سال های 1384 تا 1399 منجر به معرفی رقم عطار شد. نتایج نشان داد که رقم عطار دارای عادت رشدی نیمه­ پراکنده و درجه شاخه­ دهی دهی متوسط است. زمان اولین گلدهی رقم عطار در هفته دوم فروردین ماه بود. مطالعه وضعیت گرده­ افشانی نشان داد که این رقم خود ناسازگار است. ارقام سیاه مشهد، سوئیت هارت و دوم رس مشهد گرده افشان مناسبی برای عطار بودند. زمان برداشت عطار در هفته اول خردادماه بود. میانگین وزن میوه رقم عطار (7/37 گرم) بیشتر از رقم شاندیز (7/23 گرم) و توس (6/87 گرم) بود. همچنین، کل مواد جامد محلول در عطار (19/87 درصد) بیشتر از رقم شاندیز (16/63 درصد) و توس (17/13 درصد) بود. عملکرد عطار در مرحله باردهی اقتصادی، 40 کیلوگرم در هر درخت بود که از رقم شاندیز (22/43 کیلوگرم) بالاتر بود. اختلال ترک خوردگی میوه در رقم عطار کمتر از سایر ارقام بود. عطار ارزش اقتصادی بالایی دارد و از این رو معرفی این رقم گیلاس می­ تواند نقش مهمی در افزایش درآمد تولیدکنندگان گیلاس داشته باشد. 

Keywords [Persian]

  • رقم
  • صفات فنولوژیکی و پومولوژیک
  • عطار
  • عملکرد
  • گیلاس
Baji ME, Hafida H, En-Nahli S, Company RS, Kodad O, 2021. Morphological and pomological characteristics of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) grown in-situ under south Mediterranean climate in Morocco. International Journal of Fruit Science 21: 52-65.
Benková M, Èièová I, Benedikova D, Mendel L, and Glasa M, 2017. Variability of old sweet cherries found in Slovak regions and their preservation. Proceeding of the Latviensis Academy of Sciences 71: 184-189.
Ceccarelli D, Talento C, Favale S, Caboni E, and Cecchini F, 2018. Phenolic compound profile characterization by Q-TOF LC/MS in 12 Italian ancient sweet cherry cultivars. Plant Biosystems 152: 1346-1353.
Corneanu M, Iurea E, and Sîrbu S, 2020. Biological properties and fruit quality of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cultivars from Romanian assortment. Agronomy Research 18(4): 2353-2364.
Crisosto CH, Crisosto GM, and Ritenour MA, 2002. Testing the reliability of skin color as an indicator of quality for early season ‘Brooks’ (Prunus avium L.) cherry. Postharvest Biology and Technology 24(2): 147-154.
Faienza MF, Corbo F, Carocci A, Catalano A, Clodoveo ML, Grano M, Wang DQH, D’Amato G, Muraglia M, Franchini C, Brunetti G, and Portincasa P, 2020. Novel insights in health-promoting properties of sweet cherries. Journal of Functional Foods 69: 103-945.
Ganji Moghaddam E and Bouzari N, 2010. Scientific and practical guide to cherries (planting, holding and harvesting). Gholami Publications, pp. 344 (In Persian).
Ganji Moghadam E, Bouzari N, Kavand EA, Irvani A, Akhavan SH, Bina S, and Gouharkhay SH, 2017. Adli a new precocious cultivar with desirable size and quality. Research Achievements for Field and Horticulture Crops 6(2): 123-132 (In Persian with English abstract).
Ganji Moghaddam A, Momeni M, Bozari N, and Asgharzade A, 2014. Effect of pollination on fruit set and evaluation of phenological, pomological and morphological characteristics of some introduced sweet cherry cultivars under Khorasan Razavi province. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal(3): 1-30 (In Persian with English abstract).
Ganopoulos I, Tsaballa A, Xanthopoulou A, Madesis P, and Tsaftaris A, 2013. Sweet cherry cultivar identification by high-resolution-melting (HRM) analysis using gene-based SNP markers. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 31: 763-768. 
Garcia F, Frutos D, Lopez G, Carrillo A, and Cos J, 2014. Flowering of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cultivars in Cieza, Murcia, Spain. Acta Horticulturae 1020: 191-196.
Janes H, Ardel P, Kahu K, Kelt K, and Kikas A, 2010. Some biological properties and fruit quality parameters of new sweet cherry cultivars and perspective selections. Agronomy Research 8: 583-588.
Jia C, Waterhouse GIN, Sun-Waterhouse D, Sun YG, and Wu P, 2019. Variety–compound–quality relationship of 12 sweet cherry varieties by HPLC-chemometric analysis. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 54: 2897-2914.
Khanizadeh S, Tsao R, Rekika D, and DeEll JR, 2007. Phenolic composition and antioxidant activity of selected apple genotypes. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment 5(1): 61-66.
Li X, Wei Y, Xu J, Feng X, Wu F, Zhou R, Jin J, Xu K, Yu X, and He Y, 2018. SSC and pH for sweet assessment and maturity classification of harvested cherry fruit based on NIR hyperspectral imaging technology. Postharvest Biology and Technology 143: 112-118.
Pal MD, Mitre I, Asănică AC, Sestraş AF, Peticilă AG, and Mitre V, 2017. The Influence of rootstock on the growth and fructification of cherry cultivars in a high density cultivation system. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 5(2): 451-457.
Papapetros S, Louppis A, Kosma I, Kontakos S, and Kontominas MG, 2018. Characterization and differentiation of botanical and geographical origin of selected popular sweet cherry cultivars grown in Greece. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 72: 48-56.
Pereira S, Silva V, Bacelar E, Guedes F, Silva AP, Ribeiro C, and Gonçalves B, 2020. Cracking in sweet cherry cultivars Early Bigi and Lapins: correlation with quality attributes. Plants 9: 1-12.
Pérez-Sánchez R, Gomez-Sánchez MA, and Morales-Corts R, 2008. Agromorphological characterization of traditional Spanish sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.), sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.) and duke cherry (Prunus × gondouinii Rehd.) cultivars. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 6: 42-55.
Sansavini S and Lugli S, 2008. Sweet cherry breeding programs in Europe and Asia. Acta Horticulturae. 795: 41-57.
Tzoner R and Yamaguchi M, 1999. Investigations on some far-east Prunus species: phenology. Acta Horticulturae 488: 239 -242.
UPOV, 2008. Protocol for distinctness, uniformity and stability test. Sweet Cherry Community Plant Variety Office, CPVO-TP/07/02 Final, Switzerland.
Usenik V, Fabčič J, and Štampar F, 2008. Sugars, organic acids, phenolic composition and antioxidant activity of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.). Food Chemistry 107(1): 185-192.
Vursavus K, Kelebek H, and Selli S, 2006. A study on some chemical and physico-mechanic properties of three sweet cherry varieties (Prunus avium L.) in Turkey. Journal of Food Engineering 74(4): 568-575.
Westwood MN, 1993. Temperate-Zone Pomology: Physiology and Culture (3rd ed.). Timber Press, Portland, Oregon, USA. 535 p.