Combining ability of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) inbred lines for grain yield and physiological traits under optimum and water-stress conditions

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Field and Horticultural Crops Research Department, Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center of Semnan Province (Shahrood), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Shahrood, Iran

2 Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran

Abstract

To investigate the combining ability of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) inbred lines and also the inheritance of several physiological traits of this plant in normal irrigation and water-deficit-stress conditions, eight inbred lines with different drought tolerance were crossed with three cytoplasmic male sterile lines. The resulting 24 hybrids, 11 parents, and a commercial hybrid (Barzghar) as the control were evaluated in a split-plot design based on the randomized complete block design with three replications. Irrigation was applied in the main plots at two levels, normal (irrigation based on 100% water requirement) and stress (irrigation withhold after the appearance of the inflorescence), and 36 sunflower genotypes in subplots. During the growing season, chlorophyll content (Chl), relative water content (RWC), leaf water loss (LWL), early growth rate (EGR), leaf temperature (LT), and grain yield (GY) were measured. The analysis of variance showed the significant effect of water-deficit stress on Chl, RWC, LT, and GY. According to the results of the line × tester analysis, the effect of lines was significant for Chl, LWL, EGR, and GY in normal conditions, and on Chl and EGR in the water-deficit-stress conditions. In the case of the testers, there was a significant difference in Chl, EGR, and GY under normal conditions, and in LWL, EGR, and GY under stress conditions. The significant effect of lines and testers on these traits indicated a difference between their general combining ability (GCA) and the existence of additive gene effects. The interaction of line × tester was significant only for GY in normal conditions. Chl and EGR had a relatively high broad-sense and narrow-sense heritability at both conditions. The GY had also relatively high broad-sense heritability in both conditions but its narrow-sense heritability was only relatively high at the water-deficit-stress conditions. The C122 and C123 lines and the A19 tester had the highest positive GCA for GY in both conditions. The hybrid A196 × C41 in the normal conditions and A112 × C111 in the stress conditions had a positive SCA. Among the physiological traits, only LWL showed a significant correlation with GY in normal conditions. Under water-deficit-stress conditions, LWL and EGR had a positive correlation with GY, while LT showed a negative correlation with GY. In conclusion, it seems that LWL, EGR, and LT can be used to indirectly improve GY of sunflower under water-deficit stress conditions.

Keywords


Abedini Esfahlani M, 2018. Combining ability and heterosis of drought resistance indices in sunflower. Ph.D. thesis, Zanjan University, Zanjan, Iran (In Persian with English abstract).
Alavi SR, Darvishzadeh R, Valizadeh M, Moghadam M, Farrokhi I, Basirnia A, and Pirzad A, 2014. Evaluation of drought tolerance indices in various sunflowers cultivars (Helianthus annuus L.). Research in Field Crops 2: 16-27 (In Persian with English abstract).
Alizadeh A and Kamali GA, 2008. Crops Water Requirements in Iran. Emam Reza University Press, Mashhad, Iran (In Persian).
Alza JO and Fernandez-Martinez JM, 1997. Genetic analysis of yield and related traits in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in dryland and irrigated environments. Euphytica 95: 243-251.
Arefi S, Nabipour A, and Samizadeh H, 2015. Evaluation of combining ability of sunflower lines based on line × tester analysis under water stress and non-stress conditions. Journal of Crop Breeding 7: 115-125 (In Persian with English abstract).
Bhatt G, 1973. Significance of path coefficient analysis in determining the nature of character association. Euphytica 22: 338-343.
Dhanda S and Sethi G, 1998. Inheritance of excised-leaf water loss and relative water content in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum). Euphytica 96: 39-47.
Ghaffari M, Farrokhi I, and Mirzapour M, 2011. Combining ability and gene action for agronomic traits and oil content in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) using F1 hybrids. Crop Breeding Journal 1(1): 73-84.
Ghaffari M, Toorchi M, Valizadeh M, and Shakiba MR, 2012. Morpho-physiological screening of sunflower inbred lines under drought stress condition. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 17: 185-190.
Gholinezhad E and Darvishzadeh R, 2018. Estimates of variance components and heritability of grain yield and yield components in confectionary sunflower landraces in different levels of irrigation. Plant Productions 41(2): 29-40 (In Persian with English abstract).
Gholinezhad E, Darvishzadeh R, and Bernousi I, 2013. Evaluation of genetic variations in Iranian confectionery sunflower landraces (Helianthus annuus L.) under various water treatment conditions. Journal of Plant Physiology and Breeding 3(2): 67-82.
Göksoy A and Turan Z, 2005. Combining abilities of certain characters and estimation of hybrid vigour in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Acta Agronomica Hungarica 52: 361-368.
Göksoy AT, Türkeç A, and Turan ZM, 2001. The quantitative inheritance in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Turkish Journal of Field Crops 6: 43-48.
Jan M, Farhatullah R, and Hassan G, 2005. Combining ability analysis in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 8: 710-713.
Kafi M, Borzoei A, Salehi M, Kamandi A, Masomi A, and Nabati J, 2009. Environmental Stress on Plant Physiology. Jihad Daneshgahi Publication, Iran (In Persian).
Karasu A, Mehmet OZ, Sincik M, Goksoy AT, and Turan ZM, 2010. Combining ability and heterosis for yield and yield components in sunflower. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 38: 259-264.
Kaya Y and Atakisi IK, 2004. Combining ability analysis of some yield characters of sunflower (Hellanthus annuns L.). Helia 27: 75-84.
Kempthorne O, 1957. An Introduction to Genetic Statistics. John Wiley & Sons Inc., NY, USA.
Khani M, Daneshian J, Zeinali Khaneghah H, and Ghannadha M, 2005. Genetic analysis of yield and its components using line × tester cross design in sunflower inbred lines under the drought stress and non-stress conditions. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science 36(2): 435-445 (In Persian with English abstract).
Memon S, Baloch MJ, Baloch GM, and Jatoi WA, 2015. Combining ability through line × tester analysis for phenological, seed yield, and oil traits in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Euphytica 204: 199-209.
Mohyaji M, Moghaddam M, Toorchi M, and Valizadeh M, 2014. Combining ability analysis in sunflower hybrids under water stress conditions. International Journal of Biosciences 5: 364-373.
Morant-Manceau A, Pradier E, and Tremblin G, 2004. Osmotic adjustment, gas exchanges and chlorophyll fluorescence of a hexaploid triticale and its parental species under salt stress. Journal of Plant Physiology 161: 25-33.
Mozaffari K, Arshi Y, and Zinali KhaneghahH, 1996. Effect of drought stress on some morphological characters and yield components of sunflower. Seed and Plant Journal 23: 24-33 (In Persian with English abstract).
Nezami A, Boroumand Rezazadehb Z, and Hosseini A, 2008. Effects of drought stress and defoliation on sunflower (Helianthus annuus) in controlled conditions. Desert 12: 99-104.
Ortis L, Nestares G, Frutos E, and Machado N, 2005. Combining ability analysis for agronomic traits in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Helia 28: 125-134.
Passioura J, 1996. Drought and drought tolerance. In: Belhassen E (ed.). Drought Tolerance in Higher Plants: Genetical, Physiological, and Molecular Biological Analysis. Pp. 1-5. Springer.
Pourmohammad A, Toorchi M, Alavikia SS, and Shakiba MR, 2014. Genetic analysis of yield and physiological traits in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) under irrigation and drought stress. Notulae Scientia Biologicae 6: 207-213.
Rauf S, Sadaqat HA, Khan IA, and Ahmed R, 2009. Genetic analysis of leaf hydraulics in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) under drought stress. Plant, Soil and Environment 2009: 62-69.
Rezaeizad A and Zaree Siahbidi A, 2015. Combining ability of some sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) lines for important agronomic traits. Seed and Plant Journal 31(2): 293-306. (In Persian with English abstract).
Saremi-Rad A and Mostafavi K, 2020. Genetic diversity study of sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) genotypes for agro-morphological traits under normal and drought stress conditions.  Plant Productions 43(2): 227-240 (In Persian with English abstract).
Sarvari M, Darvishzadeh R, Najafzadeh R, and Maleki H, 2017. Physio-biochemical and enzymatic responses of sunflower to drought stress. Journal of Plant Physiology and Breeding 7(1): 105-119.
Vannozzi G, Baldini M, Tahmasebi Enferadi S, Vedove GD, and Gomez Sanchez D, 1998. Effect of soil water availability in sunflower lines derived from interspecific crosses [Helianthus-Friuli Venezia Giulia]. Italian Journal of Agronomy 2(2): 101-110.
Veisi-Mal-Amiri I, Haghparast R, Aghaei-Sarbarzeh M, Farshadfar E, and Rajabi R, 2009. Evaluation of drought tolerance of barley (Hordeum vulgar) genotypes using physiological characteristics and drought tolerance indices. Seed and Plant Journal 1-26: 43-60 (In Persian with English abstract).
Volotovich AA, Silkova TA, Fomchenko NS, Prokhorenko OV, and Davydenko OG, 2008. Combining ability and heterosis effects in sunflower of Byelorussian origin. Helia 31: 111-118.
Xing H, Tan L, An L, Zhao Z, Wang S, and Zhang C, 2004. Evidence for the involvement of nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species in osmotic stress tolerance of wheat seedlings: Inverse correlation between leaf abscisic acid accumulation and leaf water loss. Plant Growth Regulation 42: 61-68.
Yousefi F, Hassibi P, Roshanfekr H, and Meskarbashee M, 2016. Study of drought and salinity stress effect on some physiological characters of two canola (Brassica Napus L.) varieties in Ahvaz. Plant Productions 38(4): 25-34 (In Persian with English abstract).