Evaluation of agro-morphological traits of Chitti bean lines using multivariate analyses

Document Type : Research Paper


Seed and Plant Improvement Institute (SPII), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran


Improving knowledge on the relationships between agro-morphological traits in Chitti bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) will contribute to identifying key traits affecting grain yield for use in bean breeding programs. A field experiment was conducted using an augmented design consisting of 116 breeding lines and three checks (Sadri, Kousha, Khomein local). Statistical analysis showed that grain yield and seeds per plant had the largest variations. Regression analysis showed that days to emergence of the first trifoliate leaf (V3), seeds per pod, and plant height, explained more than 39 percent of the variation in grain yield. Path analysis indicated a high negative direct effect of V3 and a positive direct effect of seeds per pod on grain yield. Cluster analysis helped to classify all genotypes into four distinct groups. From the genotypes studied, 38 superior genotypes were selected, which can be used in the breeding programs of Chitti bean Also, number of days to emergence of the first trifoliate leaf and the number of seeds per pod were identified as traits useful to consider in bean breeding programs aiming at improving the grain yield of Chitti beans.


Article Title [فارسی]

ارزیابی صفات زراعی-مورفولوژیکی لاین های لوبیا چیتی با استفاده از روش های آماری چندمتغیره

Author [فارسی]

  • علی اکبر قنبری
موسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه نهال و بذر، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج
Abstract [فارسی]

به‌منظور بررسی صفات کمی و کیفی 116 لاین لوبیا چیتی، آزمایشی با سه شاهد (صدری، کوشا، محلی خمین) با استفاده از یک طرح اوگمنتد اجرا شد. بررسی نتایج نشان داد که عملکرد دانه و تعداد دانه در بوته از بیشترین تغییرات برخوردار بودند. تجزیه رگرسیون صفات  حاکی از آن بود که تعداد روز تا سه ‌برگچه اول، تعداد دانه در غلاف و ارتفاع بوته بیش از 39 درصد تغییرات عملکرد را توجیه کردند. تجزیه علیت صفات نشان داد که تعداد روز تا ظهور سه‌برگچه اول و ارتفاع بوته با ضریب منفی و تعداد دانه در غلاف با ضریب مثبت مؤثرترین عوامل مستقیم تغییرات عملکرد دانه هستند. تجزیه خوشه‌ای صفات لاین‌ها را در چهار گروه مجزا قرار داد. از بین ژنوتیپ‌های مورد مطالعه، 38 ژنوتیپ برتر انتخاب شدند که می‌توان از آن ها در برنامه‌های اصلاحی لوبیا چیتی استفاده کرد. همچنین برای افزایش عملکرد می توان از صفاتی مانند تعداد روز تا ظهور سه‌برگچه اول و تعداد دانه در غلاف در برنامه های اصلاحی لوبیا چیتی استفاده نمود.

Keywords [فارسی]

  • تجزیه چند متغیره
  • تعداد دانه در غلاف
  • تعداد غلاف در بوته
  • عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد
  • لوبیا
Aggarwal VD, Natare RB, and Smithson JB, 1982. The relationship among yield and other characters in vegetable cowpea and the effect of different trellis management on pod yield. Tropical Grain Legume Bulletin 25: 8-14.
Amini A, Ghannadha MR, and Abdemishani S, 2000. Factor analysis for morphological and phenological traits in common bean. Seed and Plant Journal 16: 210-225 (In Persian with English abstract).
Arunachalam V, 1981. Genetic divergence in plant breeding. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 41: 226-236.
Arya PS, Rana A, and Rana A, 1999. Study of direct and indirect influence of some yield traits on green pod yield in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Advances in Horticulture and Forestry 6: 99-106.
Awan FK, Khurshid MY, Afzal O, Ahmed M, and Chaudhry AN, 2014. Agro-morphological evaluation of some exotic common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes under rainfed conditions of Islamabad, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Botany 46: 259-264.
Azizi F, Rezaei A, and Mirmohammadi Maybodi SAM, 2001. Genetic and phenotypic variability and factor analysis for morphological traits in genotypes of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources-Water and Soil Science 5: 127-141 (In Persian with English abstract).
Blair MW, Díaz LM, Buendía HF, and Duque MC, 2009. Genetic diversity, seed size associations, and population structure of a core collection of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 119: 955-72.
Chiorato AF, Carbonell SAM, Benchimo LL, Chiavegato MB, Dos Santos Dias LA, and Colombo CA, 2007. Genetic diversity in common bean accessions evaluated by means of morpho-agronomical and RAPD data. Scientia Agricola 64: 256-262.
Chiorato AF, Carbonell SAM, Colombo CA, Dias LAS, and Ito MF, 2005. Genetic diversity of common beans accessions in the germplasm bank of the Instituto Agronômico– IAC. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 5: 1-9.
Cokkizgin A, Colkesen M, Idikut L, Ozsisli B, and Girgel U, 2013. Determination of relationships between yield components in bean by using path coefficient analysis. Greener Journal of Agricultural Science 3: 85-89.
Dargahi HR, Vaezi S, Omidi M, and Aghaei MJ, 2008. An evaluation of the diversity in morphological traits and an identification of the relationships among these traits of white common bean collected in national plant gene bank of Iran. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Science 39: 155-162 (In Persian with English abstract).
Ebrahimi M, Bihamta MR, Hoseinzade A, Khial Parast F, and Golbashy M, 2010. Evaluation of yield and yield components and some agronomic traits of white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes under Karaj climate. Agroecology 2: 129-135 (In Persian with English abstract).
Farshadfar E, 1997. Breeding methodology. University of Kermanshah, Iran (In Persian).
Ghanbari AA, 2015. Preliminary evaluation of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) germplasm. Seed and Plant Improvement Institute (SPII), Karaj, Iran. Project No. 2-03-03-93160.
Javadin M and Nakhjavan Sh, 2013. Classification of some Chitti bean genotypes based on the morphological and phenological traits using multivariate statistical methods. Proceedings of the 5th Iranian Pulse Crops Symposium, February 25, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran (In Persian).
Keshavarznia R, Mohammadi Nargesi B, and Abbasi A, 2013. The study of genetic variation of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) based on morphological traits under normal and stress conditions. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Science 44: 305-315 (In Persian with English abstract).
Molaei A, Ghaffari Khaligh H, and Bagheri H, 2005. A correlation and path coefficient analysis between seed yield and its components in common bean. Proceedings of the 1st Iranian Pulse Crops Symposium, November 20-21, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran (In Persian).
Rahnamaie Tak A, Vaezi S, Mozafari J, and Shahnejat Bushehri AA, 2007. Study on correlation and path analysis for seed yield per plant and its dependent traits in red bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Agronomy Journal 76: 80-88 (In Persian with English abstract).
Safapour M, Khagani S, Amirabadi M, Teymouri M, and Bazyan MK, 2009. Statistical analysis of the effect of water stress on phenological and agronomical traits of white bean genotypes. New Agriculture Findings 4: 367-378 (In Persian with English abstract).
Sanjeev Deshpand K, Patil BR, Salimath PM, Nidagundi JM, and Karthigeyan S, 2010. Evaluation of native and collected germplasm for earliness seed traits and resistance to rust, CMV, and leaf spot in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp]. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 1: 384-392.
Shafiee-Koyej F and Saba J, 2013. Evaluation of white bean lines based on phenological and agronomic traits using multivariate statistical methods. Iranian Journal of Crop Science 14: 383-394 (In Persian with English abstract).
Singh SP, 2001. Broadening the genetic base of common bean cultivars. Crop Science 41: 1659-1675.
Soghani M, Vaezi S, and Sabbaghpour SH, 2010. Study on correlation and path analysis for seed yield and its dependent traits in white bean genotypes (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Agronomy and Plant Breeding Journal 6: 27-36 (In Persian with English abstract).
Ulukapi K and Naci Onus A, 2014. Phenotypic evaluation of some Turkish green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris l.) genotypes. Pakistan Journal of Botany 46: 1415-1420.
Vasi M, Gvozdanovi-Varga J, and Ervenski J, 2008. Divergence in the dry bean collection by principal component analysis (PCA). Genetika 40: 23 -30.