Morpho-physiological performance of seven short-day and day-neutral strawberry cultivars in the soilless culture

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Horticulture, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University

2 Head, Horticultural Science Research Institute, Shahid Hemmat Street, Mohammad Shar Roud, Karaj, Iran

Abstract

Strawberry cultivation requires the use of cultivars adapted to the field or greenhouse conditions of the production region. Seven commercial of short day (SD) and day neutral (DN) strawberry cultivars (Camarosa, Kurdistan, Mrak, Paros, Queen Elisa, Selva, Ventana) were compared as a completely randomized design for different morpho-physiological characters under greenhouse conditions. The cultivars showed variation for all of the studied traits. Days to flowering varied from 53.2 to 94.5 days among the cultivars and Paros followed by Camarosa required minimum days for flowering. The highest total chlorophyll content and fruit volume were obtained in Camarosa and Paros, while the highest fruit weight was found in Paros, Ventana, Camarosa and Kurdistan. The cultivar Camarosa produced the highest of flower number (42.0), fruit number (36.3), fruit firmness (4.8 N) and yield (424.7 g per plant). The TSS/TA ratio was observed maximum in Paros and minimum in Ventana and Mrak. The highest of fruit anthocyanin was recorded in Camarosa and Selva. Correlation analysis revealed that yield per plant had a positive correlation with total chlorophyll content of leaves, number of flower and fruit, weight and volume of fruit, while negatively correlated to leaf area and crown number. According to stepwise multiple regression analysis, yield had the highest relationship with the number of flowers and fruit weight, respectively. Generally, vegetative traits as well as days to flowering and fruiting were higher in DN cultivars (Mrak, Selva). However, SD cultivars produced higher flower number, fruit size and yield than DN cultivars. The cultivars Camarosa and Paros were most adapted to the greenhouse conditions among the experimental cultivars.

Keywords


Introduction

Strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.), which belongs to the family Rosaceae, is a widely grown fruit crop in the world for its fruit organoleptic and nutritional properties (Arias et al. 2014). Strawberries are low in calories and have interesting content of niacin, vitamins A, B, C and minerals such as phosphorus, potassium, calcium and iron (Moreno et al.2014; Miri et al. 2017). It contains polyphenolic compounds such as anthocyanin and phenolic acids, which display a wide range of biological activities such as antioxidant,      cardioprotective     effects,      anti-

 

inflammatory properties and reduction in the risk of diabetes. Because antioxidant capability is an important anticancer weapon, strawberries can be considered as a good candidate for scavenging free radicals and reducing carcinogenesis (Moreno et al.2014; Pérez et al.2014).

Recently, the greenhouse production of strawberries in Iran is expanding and hydroponic systems are being increasingly used (Eshghi et al. 2007). To obtain the highest yield potential, it is necessary to optimize every aspect of the production indicators (Zanin et al. 2019).  The correct  choice  of  a cultivar is  a special aspect for

successful strawberry plantation, which must be adapted to the conditions of the growing site (Selamovska, 2014; Zanin et al., 2019). The hybrid F. ananassa Duch. is the result of natural hybridization between the species F. chiloensis and F. virginiana, and the large differences between the species that compose the genetic base of F. ananassa allow a greater range of adaptation and quality of commercial strawberry cultivars (Antunes et al. 2010).

There are two primary types of strawberries now grown commercially in the world, day-neutral (DN) and short-day (SD) plants. The short-day types initiate flower buds under either short-day conditions (less than 14 h of day length) or when temperatures are less than 15 °C. Day-neutrals are insensitive to photoperiod and continue to flower as long as temperatures are between 4 and 29 °C and produce crowns and flower buds approximately three months after planting, regardless of the day length (Hancock 2000; Ruan et al. 2013).

Export has become an important development in the strawberry industry over the last decade in Iran. The requirements of the particular markets being targeted are the major factors involved in the selection of a cultivar to be planted by a grower. These requirements can differ greatly. For processing, they can depend on what the particular processor requires, although there is a general trend toward fruits with bright red flesh. For the local fresh market, cultivars that produce consistently over long periods in the spring, summer and autumn have an advantage. For fresh export, a long shelf-life is important but the requirements for skin color and size depending on the particular market (Carter et al. 1988).

The most common cultivars that are grown in Iran are: Kurdistan, Selva, Camarosa, Pajero, Parus, Queen Elisa, Aliso, Gaviota, Fresno, Missionary and Atabaky. Despite growing demands for strawberries in the Iranian market, adapted cultivars for different locations have not been selected (Eshghi et al. 2007).  So, it is necessary to evaluate the agronomic performance of these cultivars under field and greenhouse conditions (Antunes et al. 2010; Moshiur Rahman et al. 2013). Hence, studies about these important traits are necessary for the successful cultivation of this crop in Iran. The present study was undertaken to evaluate some SD and DN strawberry cultivars cultivated under greenhouse conditions for vegetative and reproductive characters and to select superior genotypes based on performance and fruit quality traits.

 

Materials and Methods

The experiment was conducted in a commercial greenhouse which is located at Hashtgerd, Iran (latitude 35º98'46" N, longitude 50º72'84" E, altitude 1200 meters). The greenhouse had a metallic structure with a covering polyethylene film and was equipped with a pad and fan cooling system. The temperature and relative humidity during the cropping period were around 15-20 °C and 60-80%, respectively.

Healthy and disease free daughter plants of the five SD (Camarosa, Kurdistan, Paros, Queen Elisa, Ventana) and two DN (Mrak, Selva) strawberry cultivars were considered as treatments and transplanted in the 7-liter pots containing substrate mixture of cocopeat and perlite (1:1) in early November. A balanced nutrient solution was supplied  by  drip  irrigation. The  strawberry  fruits

 

 

 

were picked up manually at commercial maturity when at least 80% of the fruit surface turned red, at an interval of 3-4 days during early morning hours while the weather was cool. Fruit harvest started in late February and lasted until early May.

A total of 17 morphological variables representing both reproductive and vegetative characteristics and characters relating to the yield of the plants were measured throughout the growing season as follows: number of leaves, leaf area, total chlorophyll of leaves, number of crowns, days to flowering after planting, number of inflorescences, the total number of flowers, days to fruit set after planting, number of fruits per plant, fruit volume, fruit weight, yield per plant, fruit firmness, fruit anthocyanin, total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity (TA) and TSS/TA ratio.

The leaf area was measured by using a leaf area meter. Fruit firmness was recorded using a penetrometer (Wagner, USA) with a probe of 2 mm in diameter and 6 mm in penetration. The TSS of ripe fruit juice was determined with the help of a hand refractometer and expressed in °Brix. Titratable acidity was measured by titration of 10 g crushed pulp + 100 ml distilled water with a standard 0.1 M NaOH solution, obtaining the turning point when the solution reached the pH = 8.2 and expressed in grams of citric acid per 100 g pulp. The anthocyanin content was determined according to Van De Velde et al. (2013).

The experiment was laid out as a completely randomized design with three replications. The mean value of each observation was calculated based on four plants for each cultivar in every replication. Data were analyzed using SPSS statistical software, ver. 21 and the means were compared by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (p ≤ 0.05 and 0.01). To determine the relationship between the traits under study, Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated and stepwise multiple regression analysis was carried out.

 

Results and Discussion

The F ratios in the analysis of variance were significant for all of the vegetative and reproductive characters (Table 1), which indicated the presence of genetic variability among the studied cultivars. The coefficient of variation (CV) for all traits (except days to flowering) was less than 15% that in accordance with Couto et al. (2013), shows good experimental precision.

 

 

Table 1. Analysis of variance for vegetative, reproductive and fruit physicochemical traits of seven strawberry cultivars.

Cultivar

df

Mean square

LN

LA

TC

CN

DFl

IN

FlN

DFrS

FrN

FrW

FrV

Y

FrF

TSS

TA

TSS/TA

FrA

Cultivar

6

1416**

1330**

1.2*

19.3**

547**

1.7*

137**

528**

80**

27**

18**

36648**

1.6*

14.4*

0.08*

90**

163**

Error

14

41

146

0.02

1.9

257

0.6

13

18

5

2

1

897

0.05

0.7

0.01

1

5

CV (%)

 

10.9

12.4

2.7

14.1

22.0

12.1

11.9

4.8

8.2

14.2

10.0

11.2

6.3

9.8

8.0

8.5

11.5

Abbreviations: LN: leaf number, LA: leaf area, TC: total chlorophyll, CN: crown number, DFl: days to flowering after planting, IN: inflorescence number, FlN: flower number,

DFrS: days to fruit set after planting, FN: fruit number, FW: fruit weight, FV: fruit volume, Y: yield per plant, FrF: fruit firmness, TSS: total soluble solids, TA: titratable acidity, TSS/TA: TSS/TA ratio, FrA: fruit anthocyanin.

*, **significant at p ≤ 0.05 and 0.01, respectively.

 

 

 

 

 

 


Leaf number, leaf area and total chlorophyll content

Leaf number differed significantly among cultivars ranging from 23.6 (Queen Elisa) to 87.0 (Mrak). The leaf area was highest in Selva and Mrak, while the maximum of total chlorophyll content was in Camarosa and Paros (Table 2). These traits are important for photosynthesis (Moshiur Rahman et al. 2013), as the total chlorophyll content- an indicator of the leaf photosynthesis (Miri et al. 2015)- was positively correlated with most of the reproductive variables (days to flowering, number of inflorescences and flowers, number of fruits, fruit weight and volume as well as yield) (Table 3). Moshiur Rahman et al. (2013) showed that the number of leaves in different strawberry cultivars varied mainly due to the genetic as well as the environmental effects and obtained from 20.3 to 46.6 leaves per plant in different germplasm. In our results, leaf number presented a positive correlation with some of the reproductive variables and fruit characteristics such as flower number, fruit volume, TSS and anthocyanin (Table 3). So, the incidence of damage in the strawberry leaves negatively affects the number of inflorescences and, ultimately, the yield will be decreased (Grijalba et al., 2015). On the other hand, leaf area showed a negative relationship with yield, however, its correlation coefficient was moderate (Table 3). The higher leaf area may cause the leaves to shade over each other and the shaded leaves show a lower photosynthetic efficiency. Also, Mochizuki et al. (2013) revealed that lower leaf area index rates may be observed under heavy fruit load.


 

 

                 Table 2. Means of vegetative, reproductive and fruit physicochemical traits of seven strawberry

                 cultivars.

Cultivar

LN

LA

(cm2)

TC

 (µg/gFW)

CN

DFl

IN

FlN

DFrS

FrN

Camarosa

56.0d**

81.0cd

6.9a

6.7c

63.0d

7.3ab

42.0a

80.5cd

36.3a

Kurdistan

70.6bc

62.6d

5.2d

6.6c

70.0c

6.4b

30.2c

86.1c

28.6b

 Mrak

87.0a

112.3ab

6.0c

10.3b

94.5a

7.0ab

28.3cd

113.4a

26.3b

Paros

39.3e

104.0b

6.7a

10.0b

53.2e

7.3ab

35.3b

73.5d

30.6b

Selva

59.6cd

127.6a

6.0c

12.6ab

84.0b

6.4b

25.2d

100.1b

25.2c

Ventana

75.3b

97.6bc

6.3b

9.3b

74.2c

8.1a

24.3d

86.8c

20.4d

 

 

 

                   Table 2 continued.

Cultivar

FrW (g)

FrV (cm3)

Y (g/plant)

FrF

(N)

TSS

TA

TSS/TA

FrA (µg/gFW)

Camarosa

11.7a

12.7a

424.7a

4.8a

8.7b

0.8b

10.9c

26.6a

Kurdistan

10.6ab

10.5b

306.1bc

2.8d

11.0a

0.9a

11.7c

23.6b

 Mrak

8.6bc

6.3c

226.2c

3.1cd

5.6c

0.8b

7.1d

21.3b

Paros

13.2a

13.3a

404.0b

2.8d

10.7a

0.4e

23.3a

6.1d

Selva

7.0cd

10.4b

176.4d

3.7c

7.7b

0.5de

14.0bc

24.0ab

Ventana

12.3a

11.0b

251.0c

4.0b

6.3c

0.7bc

8.5d

22.3b

                     Symbols as in Table 1.

                     Mean values followed by the same letters in each column do not differ significantly by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test at

                     p ≤ 0.05 or 0.01, according to Table 1.

 


 

 

 

Number of crowns

The highest number of crowns was found in Queen Elisa and Selva, whereas the minimum was in Camarosa and Kurdistan (Table 2). Moshiur Rahman et al. (2013) also found a significant difference in the number of crowns among the strawberry germplasm in Bangladesh.

The vegetative component of strawberries is important because plants with a high vigor can produce more photoassimilates and, therefore, a higher ability to produce flowers and fruits. However, there is a competition for assimilates

 

between the vegetative and reproductive components (Grijalba et al. 2015). Strong vegetative growth expressed through many crowns or high leaf area may weaken yield (Singh et al. 2018). Perhaps this is why there was a negative relationship between the number of crowns with the most reproductive traits as well as the physicochemical characteristics of the fruits (Table 3). Lopez-Galarza et al. (1997) found that fruit weight decreased linearly with the crown number in Oso Grande and Vilanova, while it was not affected in Chandler or Pajaro. 

 

 

Table 3. Correlation coefficients among vegetative, reproductive and fruit physicochemical traits in the strawberry cultivars.

Trait

LN

LA

TC

CN

DFl

IN

FlN

DFrS

FrN

FrW

FrV

Y

FrF

TSS

TA

TSS/TA

LA

-0.02

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TC

0.04

0.19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CN

-0.37

0.78**

-0.18

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DFl

0.22

0.23

0.51*

0.02

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IN

0.01

-0.38

0.65*

-0.60*

0.20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FlN

0.63*

0.37

0.46*

-0.57*

0.13

-0.07

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DFrS

-0.03

0.55*

0.07

0.59*

0.98**

0.29

-0.76**

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FrN

-0.36

0.26

0.50*

-0.59*

-0.24

-0.09

0.98**

-0.70**

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FW

0.33

-0.34

0.65*

-0.73**

-0.14

0.68**

0.28

0.03

0.38

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FV

0.86**

0.30

0.67*

-0.47*

0.08

0.25

0.33

0.12

0.46*

0.78**

 

 

 

 

 

 

Y

0.09

-0.43*

0.70*

-0.78**

0.32

0.38

0.76**

-0.37

0.80**

0.87**

0.77**

 

 

 

 

 

FrF

-0.71**

-0.52*

-0.29

-0.17

-0.68**

-0.57*

0.21

-0.23

0.31

-0.02

0.19

0.19

 

 

 

 

TSS

0.58*

-0.70**

-0.24

-0.67**

-0.05

0.21

0.15

-0.63*

0.14

-0.04

-0.23

0.09

-0.12

 

 

 

TA

-0.80**

0.12

-0.31

0.31

-0.46*

-0.22

0.13

0.23

0.18

0.11

0.40

0.16

0.71**

-0.76**

 

 

TSS/TA

-0.21

-0.04

0.28

-0.01

0.41

0.17

0.11

-0.24

0.13

-0.16

0.04

-0.02

-0.19

0.66**

-0.82**

 

FrA

0.68**

0.23

0.01

-0.45*

0.15

0.23

0.09

-0.23

0.13

0.04

-0.03

0.06

-0.49*

0.09

-0.29

0.37

Symbols as in Table 1

*, **significant at p ≤ 0.05 and 0.01, respectively.

 

 

 


Days to flowering

The maximum number of days (94.5) required for flowering was in Mrak followed by Selva (84.0 days) and the minimum in Paros and Camarosa (53.2 and 63.0 days, respectively) (Table 2). This is because Paros and Camarosa might be early genotypes. Mendonca et al. (2017) recorded that the Albion, Camarosa and Ventana cultivars were precocious since they started flowering at 63 days after planting. According to Chowhan et al. (2016), the minimum days to flower initiation were observed in Camarosa and Festival. Sonstebya et al. (2017) also found a significant variation in days to anthesis, which is also in agreement with the present findings. They found that strawberry cultivar Valentine required a minimum time of anthesis followed by Glima, Zefyr and Camarosa. Days to flower initiation varies mainly due to genotypes, stage of growth, photoperiod as well as temperature, and this explains why the genotype by environment interaction causes distinct phenotypic expressions (Chowhan et al.2016; Mendonca et al.

 

2017). Moshiur Rahman et al. (2013) reported that the number of days from transplanting to first blooming among the strawberry germplasm ranged from 48.3 to 102.3.

 

Number of inflorescences and flowers

Among the cultivars, Ventana produced the maximum number of inflorescences (8.1), followed by Camarosa, Paros and Mrak. During the study period, the highest total number of flowers was observed in Camarosa (42.0) and Paros (35.3) (Table 2). Chowhan et al. (2016) also recorded the maximum number of flowers per plant of 23.6 in Camarosa. This result was partially similar to that of Moshiur Rahman et al. (2013), who found that the number of flower inflorescences and the number of flowers per plant differed significantly among the germplasm.

The number of flowers showed a positive significant correlation with the number of fruits and yield (Table 3). Singh et al.  (2018) have also reported a positive correlation between the number of flowers/plant and the number of fruits.

 

Days to fruit set after planting

The time to fruit set showed the same pattern with the variation of the day to flowering among cultivars. Paros andCamarosa recorded a minimum fruit set duration (73.5 and 80.5 days after planting) and Mrak had a late fruit set (113.4 days after planting) (Table 2). Gaikwad et al.(2018) also reported that minimum harvesting duration was obtained in Camarosa.

 

 

Fruit number, weight and yield

The highest fruit number per plant was obtained with Camarosa (36.3). However, Paros, Ventana and Camarosa produced the heaviest berries; the bulk of the cultivars had a berry weight of 11.7-13.2 g. Also, Paros and Camarosa had the highest fruit volume, which ranged between 12.3 to 13.2 cm3. The highest yield was observed in Camarosa (424.7 g fruit per plant), followed by Paros (404.4 g fruit per plant), and the lowest yield was found in Queen Elisa (125.0 g fruit per plant) (Table 2). Data of the number of Camarosa fruits per plant found in this work were higher than those achieved by Chowhan et al. (2016), Gaikwad et al.(2018) and Zanin et al. (2019), which obtained the number of fruits per plant of 19.9, 31.7 and 20.4 fruits/plant, respectively, when grown under open field conditions. Besides, the yield results obtained in the present work for the Camarosa cultivar were greater than those reported by Diel et al. (2018) and similar to those found by Gaikwad et al.(2018) and Zanin et al. (2019). Antunes et al. (2010) reported that Camarosa had the greatest accumulated production and fruit weight. Meanwhile, these authors obtained higher values for the strawberry cultivar Camarosa (877.5 g/plant and 20.0 g, respectively). Moshiur Rahman et al. (2013) stated that fruit yield in strawberries varied significantly among the germplasm studied.

Productivity, fruit volume, fresh fruit weight and diameter of fruit are polygenic and quantitative characteristics. They are largely defined by the genetics of the cultivar and have high heritability,

 

 

even though the environment influences on the productive performance of strawberry cultivars

(Mishra et al. 2015; Zanin et al. 2019). Camarosa is a variety with prominent climatological adaptation, exceptional quality and flavor and good tolerance to diseases, and if well managed, has great productive potential and fruits with high mean weight (Ozkaya and Dundar 2009; Van De Velde et al. 2013). It even produced superior hybrids in crosses in which it participated as the female genitor for the production and physicochemical characteristics of the strawberry fruit (Barth et al. 2019).

Estimates of correlations between variables help in finding out the degree of the interrelationship among various variables and in evolving selection criteria for improvement of the most promising genotypes or adaptability studies (Mishra et al. 2015; Zanin et al. 2019). The practical utility of selection of a variable as a measure of improving another variable depends on the extent to which they are related and this relation depends not only on genotypic correlation but also on phenotypic correlation and variance (Mishra et al. 2015). Yield is the product of a combination of characters, such as number and size of fruit, plant

 

vigor, hardiness and disease resistance of the plant (Hancock et al. 2008), of these number of fruits per plant and the fruit weight is the two main components of productivity in the strawberry (Zanin et al., 2019). Based on the correlation coefficients in Table 3, the higher yield of Camarosa and Paros was due to the higher total chlorophyll content of leaves, the number of flowers and fruits, weight and volume of fruit and lower crown number. The highest correlation was obtained between yield with fruit weight (0.87) and fruit number (0.80). According to the results of stepwise multiple regression, the number of flowers and fruit weight (positively) and inflorescence number (negatively) were most related to the strawberry yield (Table 4). The final model, together with partial regression coefficients were presented in Table 4.

Similar results were obtained previously by Carp and Ciulca (2016), who found that the number of flowers has a major and significantly distinct contribution to the yield, followed by weight and numbers of fruits. Hortynski et al. (1991) stated that the total yield of large fruits correlates closely with the total yield of all fruits and depends mainly on the mean fruit weight of all fruits. On the other

 

 

Table 4. The stepwise multiple regression coefficients for the strawberry yield as the dependent variable and flower number, fruit weight and inflorescence number as independent variables.

Model

Unstandardized coefficients

 

Standardized coefficients

t

Sig.

B

Std. Error

 

Beta

Constant

-127.40

17.70

 

 

-7.20

0.006

Flower number

9.76

0.29

 

0.60

33.23

0.000

Fruit weight

21.28

0.90

 

0.57

23.68

0.000

Inflorescence number

-15.48

2.87

 

-0.11

-5.39

0.012

Model: Y= -127.395 + (9.76 × flower number) + (21.28 × fruit weight) + (-15.43 × inflorescence number)

 

 

hand, Zanin et al. (2019) found that the number of fruits per plant correlated strongly with yield, while the commercial fruit weight did not significantly influence the total production. Besides, due to the significant positive correlations of the number and weight of fruits with yield, they can be used effectively as indirect selection criteria for the plant yield.

 

Fruit firmness

There washigher fruit firmness in Camarosa, which is good character when taking post-harvest manipulation and transportation into consideration, while the lower fruit firmness was observed in Kurdistan and Paros cultivars, so they should be chosen with a lot of care, mainly when the final destination of the product is to the distant markets (Table 2). Doving and Mage (2002) tested fruit firmness in 18 strawberry cultivars and found considerable differences among them. Although they reported a low correlation between firmness and color but a significant negative correlation between firmness and anthocyanin was found in the present experiment (Table 3). Besides, the fruits with higher TA were softer than the fruits with less TA. As acidity and fruit color (anthocyanin pigmentations) are indicators of ripeness, positive and negative relationships of firmness with TA and anthocyanin, respectively, would be expected. Fruit firmness is an important trait for the quality of strawberries, whose quality is sensitive to the market, and affects the post-harvest shelf life and occurrence of transport damage (Antunes et al. 2014: Mora et al. 2019).

Biochemical characteristics of the fruit

The maximum TSS was recorded by Kurdistan, Paros and Queen Elisa and the lowest was noticed in Ventana and Mrak. Titrable acidity also varied depending on the cultivar. The highest average of TA was determined in Kurdistan, while Paros had the lowest value. On the other hand, Paros had the maximum average of total soluble solids to acidity ratio (Table 3). Changes in the weight and volume of fruits as well as yield had an insignificant influence on the sugar content and TSS/TA ratio (Table 3). Similar results were also reported by Carp and Ciulca (2016). Appearance, color, size, vitamin C and flavor (TSS, TA and TSS/TA) are very important quality characteristics for consumers (Ozkaya and Dundar, 2009). However, different cultivars may show significant differences in the contents of chemical compounds (Barth et al. 2019). The soluble-solids content is composed of some polysaccharides, among which glucose, sucrose and fructose are present in higher concentrations. organic acids, of which citric acid is the most predominant, provide the pulp acidity of strawberry fruits. Strawberry acidity and soluble-solids content are traits inherited quantitatively, controlled by several genes, with variable levels of additive and dominance control (Hancock et al. 2008; Zanin et al. 2019). The ratio of TSS/TA is a very good indicator of the fruit flavor, and strawberry fruits with the high TSS/TA ratio are more likely to be chosen by consumers, with high acidity being an unfavorable factor in this sense (Ozkaya and Dundar 2009; Antunes et al. 2010;  Zanin   et   al.   2019).   The   characteristics

 

considered for acceptable flavor quality of strawberry fruits are as follows: maximum of 0.80 g/100 g of citric acid for titratable acidity, minimum of 7.0% for soluble-solids content, and a minimum of 8.75 for TSS/TA ratio (Kader 2001). Thus, almost all cultivars evaluated in this work, except Mrak and Ventana, presented better fruit quality characters that make them suitable for commercialization.

The Camarosa and Selva cultivars had a high anthocyanin content, whereas Paros had a notably low content (Table 2). The anthocyanin content was found to be approximately in the same range as those obtained by Van De Velde et al. (2013), who reported the total anthocyanin concentrations from 22.1 to 38.4 mg/100 g in Selva and Camarosa strawberry cultivars. Color is one of the important quality attributes of strawberries (Ruan et al. 2013). Strawberry pericarp pigmentation is primarily caused by anthocyanin accumulation (Wada et al. 2010). The consumer market is increasingly interested in foods with good nutritional, higher natural antioxidants and flavor characteristics (Antunes et al. 2010; Barth et al. 2019).

 

Comparison of SD and DN cultivars

DN and SD cultivars significantly differed in terms of several vegetative and reproductive characteristics. SD showed lower leaf number, leaf area, crown number, days to flowering and fruiting,

while   their   flower   number,   fruit   weight,   fruit

 

 

volume, yield and TSS were higher than DN cultivars (Table 5). Photoperiod between 8 and 11 h is required for floral induction in SD cultivars, a situation that usually occurs in late summer and the fall and winter (Mendonca et al. 2017). Higher flower numbers and lower number of days to flowering and spring fruiting of SD cultivars as compared to the DN cultivars should be attributed to the early initiation of flowers in the SD cultivars. This can explain why SD cultivars produce a higher yield than DN cultivars. Bigger fruit size in SD also resulted in a higher yield per plant in SD than in DN. On the other hand, due to the negative correlation between leaf area and the number of crowns with yield, more vegetative growth resulted in lower flowering in SD than in DN. Since the environmental conditions were the same for all cultivars during the experiment, all these differences could be related primarily to genetic differences. It should be noted that yield-component contributions may depend on the variety, production system and environmental factors (Baumann et al. 1993; Hidaka et al. 2014). Baumann et al. (1993) indicated that varieties under one cultural system could perform differently under other systems. They found that DN varieties produced a higher yield than SD varieties during the summer and fall planting systems. However, Ruan et al. (2013) showed that the summer flower of DN cultivars came later compared with ever-bearing cultivars.

 

 

 

 

              Table 5. Means of vegetative, reproductive and fruit physicochemical traits of the short-day (SD) and

              day-neutral (DN) strawberry cultivars.

Cultivar

LN

LA (cm2)

TC (µg/gFW)

CN

DFl

IN

FlN

DFrS

FrN

FrW (g)

SD

53.0b

88.3b

6.0a

9.1b

66.0b

6.8a

31.04a

82.4b

27.4a

10.5a

DN

73.3a

120.0a

6.0a

11.5a

89.2a

6.5a

26.75b

106.7a

25.5a

7.8b

 

 

 

 

 

 

             Table 5 continued.

Cultivar

FrW (g)

FrV (cm3)

Y (g/plant)

FrF

(N)

TSS

TA

TSS/TA

FrA

 (µg/gFW)

SD

10.5a

10.6a

294.0a

3.7a

9.4a

0.7a

14.2a

18.2a

DN

7.8b

8.1b

200.2b

3.4a

6.6b

0.6a

10.6a

22.6a

 

 

 

 

 

 

                Mean values followed by the same letters in the columns do not differ significantly by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test, p ≤ 0.01.

                Symbols as in Table 1.

               

 

 

 

Conclusion

The strawberries cultivars under study showed variation in vegetative, reproductive and fruit physicochemical traits as well as in yield. Yield was positively correlated with the fruit weight, fruit number, fruit volume, flower number and total chlorophyll content of leaves. All characteristics were primarily affected by the genetic background. So, cultivar adaptability is the priority to be considered for a successful production strategy. In general, SD cultivars showed early fruiting and higher spring yield than DN cultivars. The characters of low days to flowering and fruiting as well as high fruit number, fruit size and yield seem to make Camarosa and Paros cultivars suitable for the commercial spring fruit production in the greenhouse. The unique characters of Camarosa were the highest fruit number and fruit firmness as well as high fruit anthocyanin, which make the fruits appealing appearance combined with other good fruit characters. On the other hand, Paros had the highest TSS/TA ratio. Kurdistan, Paros and Queen Elisa also exhibited the highest TSS. Since individual cultivars possessed different characters, cultivar combination utility may be a good strategy to fulfill different customer’s requirements and different consumption purposes.

 

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest with any organization concerning the subject of the manuscript.

Antunes MC, Cuquel FL, Zawadneak MAC, Mogor ÁF and Resende JTV, 2014. Postharvest quality of strawberry produced during two consecutive seasons. Horticultura Brasileira 32(2): 168-173.
Antunes LEC, Ristow NC, Krolow ACR, Carpenedo S and Reisser Júnior C, 2010. Yield and quality of strawberry cultivars. Horticultura Brasileira 28(2): 222-226.
Arias ME, Luque AC, Fernndez-Dattoli LF and Debes MA, 2014. Wild and cultivated strawberries: diversity, pigments and metabolic changes. In Malone N (Ed.). Strawberries. Pp. 215-238. Nova Science Publishers, New York, USA.
Barth E, de Resende JTV, Zeist AR, Mariguele KH, Zeist RA, Gabriel A, Camargo CK and Piran F, 2019. Yield and quality of strawberry hybrids under subtropical conditions. Genetics and Molecular Research. 18(2): gmr18156. doi: 10.4238/gmr18156.
Baumann TE, Eaton GW and Spaner D, 1993. Yield components of day-neutral and short-day strawberry varieties on raised beds in British Columbia. Hortscience 28(9): 891-894.
Carp N and Ciulca S,  2016. Correlative analysis of the relationships among some yield and quality traits in strawberry. Journal of Horticulture, Forestry and Biotechnology. 20(2): 53-58.
Carter KE, Haynes RJ and Stoker R, 1988. Field performance and fruit quality of a range of strawberry cultivars grown in mid Canterbury. New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture 16(2): 121-126.
Chowhan S, Hossain MM, Hoque MA, Rasul G and Roni MS, 2016. Yield performance of strawberry genotypes. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research 41(3): 481-489.
Couto MF, Peternelli LA and Barbosa MHP, 2013. Classification of the coefficients of variation for sugarcane crops. Ciência Rural 43(6): 957-961.
Diel MI, Marques Pinheiro MV, Cocco C, Caron BO, Fontana DC, Meira D, Thiesen LA and Schmidt D, 2018. Yield and quality performance of Italian and American strawberry genotypes in Brazil. Journal of Agricultural Science 10(2): 139-147.
Doving A and Mage F, 2002. Methods of testing strawberry fruit firmness. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B ˗ Soil & Plant Science 52(1): 43-51.
Eshghi S, Abdi G, Tafazoli E and Yavari S, 2007. Strawberry research and biotechnology in Iran. Middle Eastern and Russian Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology 1(2): 39-41.
Gaikwad SP, Sali VM and Chalak SU, 2018. Performance of strawberry cultivars under Mahabaleshwar conditions. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 7(4): 1850-1852.
Grijalba CM, Perez-Trujillo MM, Ruiz D and Ferrucho AM, 2015. Strawberry yields with high-tunnel and open-field cultivations and the relationship with vegetative and reproductive plant characteristics. Agronomía Colombiana 33(2): 147-154.
Hancock JF, 2000. Strawberries. In Erez A (Ed.). Temperate Fruit Crops in Warm Climates. Pp. 445-455. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
Hancock JF, Sjulin TM and Lobos GA, 2008. Strawberries. In Hancock JF (Ed.). Temperate Fruit Crop Breeding. Pp. 393-437. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
Hidaka K, Miyoshi Y, Ito E and Kitano M, 2014. Vertically-moving cultivation and local environment control for high strawberry yield. In Malone N (Ed.). Strawberries. Pp. 309-341. Nova Science Publishers, New York, USA.
Hortynski JA, Zebrowska J, Gawronski J and Hulewicz T, 1991. Factors influencing fruit size in the strawberry (Fragaria ananassa Duch.). Euphytica 56: 67-74.
Kader AA, 2001. Quality assurance of harvested horticultural perishable. Acta Horticulturae 553: 51-55.
Lopez-Galarza S, Maroto JV, San Bautista A and Alagarda J, 1997. Performance of waiting-bed strawberry plants with different number of crowns in winter plantings. Acta Horticulturae 439: 439-444.
Mendonca HFC, Calvete EO, Costa RCD and Nienow AA, 2017. Performance production of strawberry in environment cultivated with fig tree. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 39(4): e-615. doi: 10.1590/0100-29452017615.
Miri SM, Ahmadi S and Moradi P, 2015. Influence of salicylic acid and citric acid on the growth, biochemical characteristics and essential oil content of thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.). Journal of Medicinal Plants and By-products 2: 141-146.
Miri SM,  Hoseini M,  Souri  MK and  Abbaspour S, 2017. Effect of potassium nitrate and phenyl phthalamic acid on some of quantitative and qualitative characteristics of strawberry Gaviota. Plant Productions 39(4): 43-52.
Mishra PK, Ram RB and Kumar N, 2015. Genetic variability, heritability, and genetic advance in strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 39: 451-458.
Mochizuki Y, Iwasaki Y, Funayama M, Ninomiya S, Fuke M, Nwe YY, Yamada M and Ogiwara I, 2013. Analysis of a high-yielding strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.) cultivar ‘Benihoppe’ with focus on dry matter production and leaf photosynthetic rate. Journal of Japanese Society for Horticultural Science 82(1): 22-29.
Mora F, Zuniga PE and Figueroa CR, 2019. Genetic variation and trait correlations for fruit weight, firmness and colour parameters in wild accessions of Fragaria chiloensis. Agronomy 9(506). doi: 10.3390/agronomy9090506.
Moreno J, Petzold G, Pavez C and Zuniga P, 2014. Strawberries: antioxidant properties, health benefits and innovative technologies. In Malone N (Ed.). Strawberries. Pp. 189-213. Nova Science Publishers, New York, USA.
Moshiur Rahman M, Mizanur Rahman M, Mofazzal Hossain M, Khaleque Mian MA and Abdul Khaliq Q, 2013. Characterization and field performance of 15 strawberry germplasm under Bangladesh conditions. SAARC Journal of Agriculture 11(2): 81-94.
Ozkaya O and Dundar O, 2009. Chemical and physical characteristics of four strawberry cultivar. Asian Journal of Chemistry 21(3): 2185-2188.
Perez C, Ruiz del Castillo ML, Gil C, Banch GP and Flores G, 2014. Anthocyanins constituents, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity of strawberries: comparison with other berry fruits. In: Malone N (Ed.). Strawberries. Pp. 39-53. Nova Science Publishers, New York, USA.
Ruan J, Lee YH and Yeoung YR, 2013. Flowering and fruiting of day-neutral and ever-bearing strawberry cultivars in high-elevation for summer and autumn fruit production in Korea. Horticulture, Environment and Biotechnololy 54(2): 109-120.
Selamovska A, 2014. Strawberry: factors of high yield. In Malone N (Ed.). Strawberries. Pp. 121-188. Nova Science Publishers, New York, USA.
Singh G, Kachwaya DS, Kumar R, Vikas G and Singh L, 2018. Genetic variability and association analysis in strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 9(1): 169-182.
Sonstebya A, Roosa UM and Heide OM, 2017. Phenology, flowering and yield performance of 13 diverse strawberry cultivars grown under Nordic field conditions. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B ˗ Soil & Plant Science 67(3): 278-283.
Van De Velde F, Tarola AM, Güemes D and Pirovani ME, 2013. Bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacity of Camarosa and Selva strawberries (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.). Foods 2: 120-131.
Wada T, Oku K, Nagano S, Isobe S, Suzuki H, Mori M, Takata K, Hirata C, Shimomura K, Tsubone M, Katayama T, Hirashima K, Uchimura Y, Ikegami H, Sueyoshi T, Obu KI, Hayashida T and Shibato Y, 2017. Development and characterization of a strawberry MAGIC population derived from crosses with six strawberry cultivars. Breeding Science 67(4): 370-381.
Zanin DS, Fagherazzi AF, Santos AMD, Martins R, Kretzschmar AA and Rufato L, 2019. Agronomic performance of cultivars and advanced selections of strawberry in the South Plateau of Santa Catarina State. Revista Ceres 66(3): 159-167.