Optimization of plant growth regulators for in vitro shoot proliferation of apple cv. ʽAbbasiʼ using response surface method

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Islamic Republic of Iran.

2 Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Islamic Republic of Iran.

3 Department of Plant viruses, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Optimization of medium components in in vitro cultures is very difficult because of having multifactor nature. To optimize the plant growth regulator concentrations (BA, IBA, GA3) for shoot proliferation of apple cv. ‘Abbasi’ a three-factor experiment was designed and performed in 20 points (20 treatments) using Design Expert software based on the response surface method. A completely randomized design using eight auxin combinations (IBA+NAA) was also carried out for in vitro rooting of microcuttings. Proliferated shoot number was linearly and positively affected by the BA factor, while the response of the leaf number was linearly and negatively affected by BA. The effect of GA3 on proliferated shoot length was negative and linear. The abnormal shoot percentage in a quadratic model was influenced by all three types of PGRs, i.e. BA, IBA and GA3; positively and linear by BA, positively and quadratic by IBA and negatively and quadratic by GA3. According to the results of this experiment, the optimum concentrations for BA, IBA and GA3 combination were 1.5, 0.1 and 0.02 mg L-1, respectively, which resulted in the proliferated shoots with a rate of 2.5 shoots per explant, with 0.9 cm in length, 4.3 leaves per shoot and 4% abnormal shoots. The percentage of shoot-tip necrosis was not affected by the evaluated factors. NAA was more effective than IBA for rooting microcutings. The medium supplemented by 1 mg L-1 IBA or 0.5 mg L-1 NAA can be used successfully for rooting of apple cv. ʽAbbasiʼ shoots in vitro.

Keywords


Introduction

 

Micropropagation of apple has an important role in the rapid propagation of cultivars and rootstocks with favorable properties and it is a part of the breeding studies (Korban and Chen 1992; Ciccoti et al. 2008; Hemmaty et al. 2014; Jalali Samghabadi and Jalili Marandi 2015) and production of healthy (disease-free) plants. (O'Herlihy et al. 2003; Paprstein et al. 2008). The success and failure of micropropagation protocols depend on the proliferated shoot rate. It is affected by several factors under in vitro conditions such as genotype, medium composition, environmental factors, and so on (Dobránszki and Teixeira da Silva 2010). Proliferated shoot rate is dependent on the initiation and activation of lateral meristems controlled by hormones, mainly cytokines; however, cytokines interact with auxin, even though the auxin effect is indirect (Ward and Leyser 2004). Regenerated shoot production of apples in the medium containing cytokinin, as the main growth regulator, and low concentrations of auxin and in some cases GA3 has been reported (Yepes and Aldwinckle 1994; Kaushal et al. 2005). The effect of different growth regulators on the proliferation stage is strongly dependent on the genotype (Lane and McDougald 1982; Welander 1985; Marin et al. 1993). In many studies on apple shoot proliferation, BA has been used as a source of cytokinin and mainly in the range between 0.5 and 1 mg L-1.  Golden Delicious cultivar led to the maximum proliferated shoots when BA at 1 mg L-1 was used (Baraldi et al. 1991). Marin et al. (1993) obtained a high rate of shoot proliferation when using 1 or 2 and 2 mg L-1 of BA for Greensleeves and Tuscan (SC:7-10) cultivars, respectively. Yepes and Aldwinckle (1994) reported that BA at 1 mg L-1 is the best concentration for some apple cultivars and rootstocks. The concentration of 0.5 mg L-1 of BA, 1 and 1 mg L-1 ofBAR was used for optimum shoot proliferation in M.26, MM.106 and JTE-H rootstocks, respectively (Dobranszki et al.  2000a). MM.106 was well proliferated at 0.5 mg L-1 of BA (Sharma et al. 2000). The dose of 1 mg L-1 BA was also a suitable concentration for the shoot proliferation of MM.111 (Kaushal et al. 2005). The effect of IBA concentrations on apple shoot length was only observed in the presence of GA3 (Yepes and Aldwinckle 1994), whereas the best shoot proliferation was observed in the media supplemented with BA+GA3 and without auxin (Kaushal et al. 2005). The effect of different cytokinin derivatives (Dobránszki et al. 2000a; Magyar-Tabori et al. 2001a, b) and the simultaneous application of two types of cytokines (BA, BAR, TOP, KIN) (Modgil et al. 1999; Dobranszki et al. 2000b, c; Kaushal et al. 2005) has also been studied for apple shoot proliferation and BA or BAR at 0.5 or 1 mg l-1, KIN at 1 or 1.5 mg L-1 and TOP at 3.5 or 5 mg L-1 were effective. 

It is important to use modeling systems to determine the optimum levels of the investigated factors due to the difficulty of optimizing the medium growth regulators. As multifactor studies have been successfully applied in numerous experiments to optimize the medium composition, the Design Expert software can be used to predict optimal factors of the medium (Niedz and Evens 2006, 2007; Niedz et al. 2007; Gago et al. 2010; Gallego et al. 2011; Karimpour et al. 2020). Response surface methodology (RSM) allows a geometric dimension to be assigned to each factor, then the created geometric volume (N dimension) is the experimental design space. Several points in the experimental design space are randomly assigned to specified sampling and formulations according to the responses obtained from each of these points, so the multifactorial tests provide more information than the single-factor tests (Niedz and Evens 2007).

In addition to the shoot proliferation rate, rooting is also an important stage in micropropagation. The type of auxin and its optimum concentration for rooting depends on the genotype. M.26, MM.106 and JTE-H rootstocks were rooted in 1, 2 and 1 mg L-1 of IBA, respectively (Magyar-Tabori et al. 2002) while the MM.106 rootstock and the Gale Gala cultivars rooted at 3 and 1.5 mg L-1 IAA, respectively (Sharma et al. 2007). IBA and NAA are used for rooting in apple cultivars and rootstocks, and IBA has been reported to be more effective than NAA for most apple cultivars, although in some cultivars no significant difference was observed between the rooting ability of auxin types (Lane and McDougald 1982; Welander 1985; Zimmerman and Fordham 1985; Yepes and Aldwinckle 1994; Sharma et al. 2000; Ghanbari 2014).

This experiment was aimed to use the RSM method to find the optimum level of BA (Merck Co.), IBA (Merck Co.) and GA3 (Merck Co.) for shoot proliferation of the apple cultivar ‘Abbasi’ in the MS medium, as well as to demonstrate the possibility of using advanced statistical software to improve the experimental design for optimizing the in vitro growth. Also, rooting of apple microcuttings using IBA and NAA combination treatments was evaluated.

 

Materials and Methods

Experiment 1: Shoot Proliferation

Plant Materials: Vegetative buds of the apple cultivar ‘Abbasi’ (Malus domestica Borkh. cv. ‘Abbasi’) from current season shoots of apple trees in the Shahroud Agricultural Research Center and Natural Resources, Iran, were collected and then, were transferred to the Tissue Culture Laboratory of Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran. After washing with tap water, the buds were disinfected with ethanol 70% (1 min), and then with sodium hypochlorite solution 2% (20 min). Single node explants were cultivated in the MS medium (Murashige and Skoog 1962), supplemented by 1 mg L-1 BA and 0.05 mg L-1 IBA, 30 g L-1 sucrose and 8 g L-1 agar. After one subculture in the same medium, the uniform and identical established shoots (3 cm length) were used for the shoot proliferation experiment.

 

Statistical Design and Analysis: A three-dimensional design space defined by the plant growth regulators (BA, IBA, GA3) for the shoot proliferation stage was created at the range of concentrations recommended in previous studies (Dobranszki and Teixeira da Silva 2010). Then, growth characteristics of shoots were evaluated in the designed treatments inside or on the 3D space surface. A predicted equation was created for each response. The concentration ranges of the three growth regulators were 0.5 - 2.5 mg L-1 for BA and 0 - 0.5 mg L-1 for IBA and GA3. Twenty points were designed for the treatments (Figure 1). All 20 designed points were run simultaneously. For each treatment, 10 replicates (each replicate had one shoot in a 90 ml jar containing 10 ml medium) were assayed and were recorded after two subcultures (every four weeks in the same medium).

Number of proliferated shoots (number of regenerated shoots per explant), length of regenerated shoots (cm), number of leaves per shoot, shoot-tip necrosis (%) and abnormal shoots (%) were recorded. Abnormal shoots were recorded according to the deformity percentage from 0 to 100%.

Responses for each point were averaged over 10 replicates. For each response, the highest-order polynomial model that was significant at the 5% level was analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) (Niedz and Evens 2006, 2007; Niedz et al. 2007). Design Expert® 8 (2010) software was used for designing, model evaluation and analysis.

 

Experiment 2: Rooting

Plant Material: In  vitro  shoots  of  apple  cultivar

 

 

 

 

 
   

Figure 1. Points were designed by Design-Expert software for three-factor BA, IBA and GA3. Numbers in each point indicate replication in a point. The unit for each factor is mg l-1 (BAP: 0.5 – 2.5 mg l-1, GA3 and IBA: 0-0.5 mg l-1).

 

 

‘Abbasi’ (3 cm) grown in the MS medium containing 1 mg L-1 BA were used for this experiment. Table 1 shows the rooting treatments containing different combinations of IBA and NAA. The shoots were transferred to the rooting medium (MS, 20 mg L-1 sucrose, 8 g L-1 agar) based on the rooting treatments. The rooted shoots were transferred to small pots filled with the perlite: coco-peat (2:1) mixture. Plantlets were fed with ¼MS (one month), ½MS (two months) and then MS, respectively.

 

Statistical Design and Analysis: Rooting percentage was recorded 30 days after the beginning of the period. The experiment was conducted as a completely randomized design with five replications (10 micro-cuttings in each replicate). SAS software (SAS 1989) was used for the statistical analyses and the means were compared using Duncan’s multiple range test at the 5% level of probability.

Cultures of two experiments were kept in the controlled growth chamber at 24±2 °C, 16/8 hrs. light /darkness; a light intensity of 40 µM m-1 s-1 was provided by white fluorescent lamps.

 

Results and Discussion

Experiment 1: Shoot Proliferation

Evaluated factors (BA, IBA, GA3) had significant effects on the recorded responses in the statistical models (linear and quadratic polynomial) according to ANOVA. Shoot-tip necrosis was not affected by any of the factors (Table 2), indicating that apple shoot-tip necrosis can be influenced by other environmental factors such as mineral compounds and solidifying agent (Pasqualetto et al. 1988; Singha et al. 1990; Grigoriadou et al. 2000; Bairu et al. 2009; Reed et al. 2013a). Similarly, Thakur and Kanwara (2011) reported that shoot-tip necrosis varied in different pear genotypes and was not affected by different concentrations of BA and IBA.

 

Proliferated Shoot Number

The number of regenerated shoots was affected by BA factor (p≤ 0.0004) in a linear model (Table 2) so that the number of regenerated shoots increased with the increment of BA concentration. Increasing BA up to 2.5 mg L-1 increased shoot production to 4.39 shoots per explant (Figure 2). Other factors had no significant effect on the number of regenerated shoots (Table 2). Lane and McDougald (1982) also found lower shoot number at the low concentration of BA (1 μM) for different apple cultivars (1.22 for ‘M.27’, 0.5 for ‘M.9’ and ‘M.26’, and 1.47 for ‘Macspur’) as compared with the higher concentrations (up to 10 μM). On the other hand, 10 μM concentrations of BA decreased the number of shoots in ‘M.26’ (2.72) and ‘Macspur’ (3.10) but this decrease was less than when used at low concentration (1 mM). The optimum concentration of BA (5 and 10 μM) to produce the maximum number of shoots (3.14-7.54 shoots per explant) were depended on the type of cultivars. A similar effect of increasing BA concentration (1.1-15.4 μM) on shoot number was also reported in ‘Akero’ (Welander 1985) as the optimum BA concentration for shoot regeneration was about 8.8 μM and at higher concentrations, no increase in the number of shoots was observed. However, the amount of shoot vitrification showed no increase. In contrast, the best shoot regeneration (4-5 shoots per sample) and the best growth of MM.111 were observed in the medium with 0.5-1 mg L-1 BA and 0.5 mg L-1 GA3 without auxin (Kaushal et al. 2005).

 

Proliferated Shoot Length

Proliferated shoot length was affected by GA3 (p≤ 0.01) in a linear model (Table 2) so that with increasing GA3 concentration, the proliferated shoot length decreased. Other factors had no significant effect on this character. GA3 elimination led to the shoot length increase of up to 0.94 cm, while application of 0.5 mg L-1 GA3 produced shoots with 0.31-cm length (Figure 3). It has been reported that the addition of GA3 (0.5 mg L-1) to medium containing BA (1 mg L-1) and IBA (0.05 mg L-1) reduced shoot length of ‘Merton I. 79ʼ rootstock (Soni et al. 2011). On the other hand, the results of this experiment were not in agreement with the studies reporting the positive effect of GA3 on shoot length improvement. Yepes and Aldwinckle (1994) found that at a constant concentration of BA (1 mg L-1), the balance between GA3 and IBA affected the shoot length of some apple cultivars, thus, when the IBA level changed from 0.1 to 1 mg L-1 the shoot length increased but only in the presence of GA3 (0.5 mg L-1). At optimum BA concentrations, shoot growth of Malus × domestica cv. G.30 was affected by GA3, whereas it was unaffected at lower concentrations of BA (Geng et al. 2016).

 

Leaf Number

Leaf number was affected by the BA factor (p≤ 0.0014) in a linear model (Table 2) so that with increasing       BA     concentration,      leaf number

 

 

Table 1. Auxin combination treatments for in vitro rooting ofmicro-shoots in Malus domestica cv. ʽAbbasiʼ

Treatment

IBA (mg L-1)

NAA( mg L-1)

1

0

0.5

2

0.5

0

3

0.5

0.5

4

1

0

5

0

1

6

2.4

0

7

3.3

0

8

1.2

0.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2. Summary of statistical analyses and model output formula for five shoot proliferation responses of Malus domestica cv. ʽAbbasiʼ shoots in vitro affected by three PGR factors (BA, IBA, GA3).

Response

p-value

Formula

R-Squared

Adj R-Squared

Pred R-Squared

Model

Factors

Lack of fit

Proliferated Shoot Number (Linear Model)

0.0004

BA: 0.0004

0.742

Y = 1.569 + 0.5 BA

0.57

0.54

0.44

Proliferated Shoot Length (Linear Model)

0.0104

GA3: 0.0104

0.738

Y = 0.729-0.21 GA3

0.33

0.29

0.19

Leaf Number

(Linear Model)

0.0014

BA: 0.0014

0.538

Y = 1.51- 0.47 BA

0.44

0.41

0.30

Shoot-tip Necrosis

ns

-

-

-

-

-

-

Abnormal Shoot

(Quadratic Model)

0.0032

BA: 0.0043

IBA2: 0.0082

GA32: 0.045

0.344

Y = -1.43 + 3.01 BA + 4.69 IBA2- 3.14 GA3

0.59

0.55

0.44

ns: non-significant

Adj R-Squared: Adjusted R-Squared

Pred R-Squared: Predicted R-Squared

 

 

decreased. Other factors had no significant effect on the leaf number. The highest number of leaf production (7.9 per shoot) was obtained when BA was used at 0.5 mg L-1 and the number of leaves decreased to three leaves per shoot with an increasing BA concentration of up to 2.5 mg L-1 (Figure 4). It seems that decreasing the BA concentrations has led to higher leaf production by increasing the number of regenerated shoots and focusing on the shoot growth.

 

Abnormal Shoots

The percentage of abnormal shoots was affected by BA (p≤ 0.0043), IBA (p≤ 0.0082) and GA3 (p ≤0.045) in a quadratic polynomial model (Table 2). As shown in Figure 5 (a and b), lower concentrations of BA were effective in controlling the abnormal shoot production, and both IBA and GA3 had a significant effect on the percentage of abnormal shoots at the optimum concentration of 0.25 mg L-1 for each of them. Marin et al. (1993) reported that high  BA  concentrations led to short


 

 

 
   

 

Figure 2. Proliferated shoot number of Malus domestica cv. ʽAbbasiʼ affected by BA factor in vitro.

 

 

 

 
   

 

Figure 3. Proliferated shoot length of Malus domestica cv. ʽAbbasiʼ affected by GA3 factor in vitro.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
   

Figure 4. Leaf number of Malus domestica cv. ʽAbbasiʼ affected by BA factor in vitro.

 

 

Table 3.  Combined effects of IBA and NAA on rooting of Malus domestica cv. Abbasi micro-shoots in vitro.

NAA

IBA

Rooting

 (%)

           (mg l-1)

 

1

0

73.86 a*

0

1

49.88 abc

0.5

0

66.00 a

0

0.5

29.70 bc

0.5

0.5

40.38 abc

0.3

1.2

67.40 a

0

2.4

61.16 ab

0

3.3

19.44 c

*The data with the same letters are not significantly different based on Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (p≤ 0.05).

       

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and thick shoot production of the Greensleeves cultivar. They stated that BA at 8.8 and 17.6 μM induced swollen and deformed shoots. High concentrations of BA decreased the length of the internodes and increased the amount of vitrification that may have contributed to the shoot deformation (Karimpour et al. 2013).

 

Optimization

Experiment 2: Rooting

ANOVA showed the significant effect (p≤0.05) of auxins combination on the rooting of apple cv. ‘Abbasi’ in vitro shoots. Table 3 showed that NAA was more effective than IBA in rooting micro-shoots.  Application of 1 (Figure 7, b) and 0.5 mg L-1 NAA induced 73.86 and 66% rooting, respectively, and IBA induced 49.88 and 29.70% rooting, respectively. The lowest

The optimization results of the factor values, ​​based on the important responses of the shoot regeneration stage in apple cv. Abbasi, showed that the optimum combination concentrations for BA, IBA and GA3 are 1.5, 0.1 and 0.02 mg L-1, respectively (Figure 6).




 

 
   

Figure 5. The abnormal shoot characteristics of Malus domestica cv. ʽAbbasiʼ as affected by BA, IBA (a) and GA3 in vitro.

 

 

rooting of apple cv. ‘Abbasi’ in vitro shoots. Table 3 showed that NAA was more effective than IBA in rooting micro-shoots.  Application of 1 (Figure 7, b) and 0.5 mg L-1 NAA induced 73.86 and 66% rooting, respectively, and IBA induced 49.88 and 29.70% rooting, respectively. The lowest concentration of IBA (0.5 mg L-1) could not retrieve the negative effect of the lowest concentration of NAA (0.5 mg L-1) on rooting (40.38%) but the highest concentration of IBA (1.2 mg L-1) in combination with the lowest concentration of NAA (0.3 mg L-1) induced 67.40% rooting. Similar to our results, with increasing IBA concentration the rooting percentage decreased in the M.26 rootstock but MM.106‌    rootstock    was   poorly    rooted    and

 

 

 

 
   

Figure 6. Optimal values were predicted by Design Expert for three factors of BA, IBA and GA3 for proliferated shoot number, proliferated shoot length, leaf number and abnormal shoots of Malus domestica cv. ʽAbbasiʼ shoots in in vitro.

 

 

unaffected by the IBA treatment (Magyar-Tabori et al. 2002b). Amiri and Elahinia (2011) also reported the effectiveness of IBA (1 mg L-1) and NAA (0.5 mg L-1) combination for M.9, M.27 and ʽMM.106ʼ rooting. Similarly, Miri (2018) stated that NAA has a greater impact on the rooting of M.9 and M.26 rootstocks than IBA, and the combination of IBA+NAA can improve rooting percentage at lower concentrations. Using NAA and IBA for the apple in vitro rooting showed different results depending on the genotype. Apple rootstocks M.27, M.26 and MM.111 at 0.02 to 6.6 mg L-1 NAA rooted better than the Macspur cultivar, however, the rootstock M.9 produced no roots (Lane and McDougald 1982). The Akero cultivar had 100% rooting using 0.5 mg L-1 IBA (Welander 1985). In vitro application of IBA and NAA had no significant effect on Royal Red Delicious, Gala, Golden Delicious and Spur McIntosh, while IBA significantly induced the

 

rooting in the Delicious, Redspur Delicious, McIntosh and Mutsu cultivars and NAA induced better rooting than IAA in the three cultivars of Delicious, McIntosh and Spartan (Zimmerman and Fordham 1985). In the other study, IBA was more effective than NAA for the MM.106 rooting (Sharma et al. 2000). The concentration of 1.5 mg L-1 of IBA induced maximum rooting in Azayesh-Esfahan, Morabei Mashhad and M.9 rootstocks (Ghanbari 2014).

The different stages of apple micropropagation cv. Abbasi are illustrated in Figure 7. The rooted shoots were transferred to pots containing cocopeat : perlite (1:1) mixture after removal of agar from the root medium and rinsed with water. After six weeks of adaptation in the growth chamber (Figure 7, c), they were transferred to the larger pots and kept in the greenhouse (Figure 7, d).

 

 

 

 
   

 

 

 

Figure 7. Malus domestica cv. ‘Abbasi’ in different stages of in vitro propagation: a) shoot proliferation in PMI medium (1.6 mg l-1 BA + 0.27 mg l-1 IBA+ 0.01 mg l-1 GA3); b and c) rooted shoot induced by 1 mg l-1 NAA; d and e) ‘Abbasi’ plantlets after 6 weeks (in the laboratory) and three months (in the greenhouse) of adaptation, respectively.

 

 

Conclusion

Response surface methods evaluate the interactions between multiple factors for one or more characters and aim to optimize responses based on the studied factors. In this experiment, the Design Expert software was successfully used to optimize the amount of plant growth regulators ​​including BA, IBA and GA3 for the shoot proliferation-related responses of apple cv. ‘Abbasi’. The number of regenerated shoots was linearly and positively affected by BA, whereas leaf number response was linearly and negatively affected. The effect of GA3 on the shoot length was linear and negative. The percentage of abnormal shoots in a quadratic polynomial model was affected by all three factors, BA, IBA and GA3, while the response to BA was positive and linear, and the response to IBA and GA3 werepositive and negative, respectively in a quadratic model. According to the results of this experiment, optimum concentrations for BA, IBA and GA3 were 1.5, 0.1 and 0.02 mg L-1, respectively. The production of normal shoots with a high regeneration rate appears to be more influenced by the quantity (amount) and quality (ratio) of the mineral combination rather than PGRs (Reed et al. 2013a; Reed et al. 2013b; Wada et al. 2013a; Wada et al. 2013b; Wada et al. 2015; Karimpour et al. 2020). Therefore, to improve the quantity and quality of the shoots produced during the shoot proliferation phase, complementary experiments including optimization of salts and other components of the medium such as vitamins and environmental factors should also be designed and evaluated by the response surface methods. The highest rooting percentage of apple cv. ‘Abbasi’ shoots were obtained using 1 mg L-1 (73.86%) and then 0.5 mg L-1 NAA (66%).

 

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest with any organization concerning the subject of the manuscript.


Amiri M and Elahinia A, 2011. Optimization of medium composition for apple rootstocks. African Journal of Biotechnology 10(18): 3594-3601.
Bairu MW, Stirk WA and Van Staden J, 2009. Factors contributing to in vitro shoot-tip necrosis and their physiological interactions. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 98: 239-248.
Baraldi R, Fasolo Fabbri Malavasi F, Predieri S and M Castagneto, 1991. Effect of potassium humate on apple cv. ‘Golden Delicious’ cultured in vitro. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 24: 187-191.
Ciccoti AM, Bisognin C, Battocletti I, Salvadori A, Herdemertens M and Jarausch W, 2008. Micropropagation of apple proliferation-resistant apomictic Malus sieboldii genotypes. Agronomy Research 6: 445-58.
Design-Expert, 2010. Computer software. Stat-Ease, Inc., Minneapolis, USA.
Dobranszki J, Abdul-Kader A, Magyar-Tabori K, Jambor-Benczur E, Buban T, Szalai J and and Lazanyi J, 2000a. In vitro shoot multiplication of apple: comparative response of three rootstocks to cytokinins and auxin. International Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology 6: 36-9.
Dobranszki J, Abdul-Kader A, Magyar-Tabori K, Jambor-Benczur E, Buban T, Szalai J and Lazanyi J, 2000b. Single and dual effects of different cytokinins on shoot multiplication of different apple scions. International Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology 6: 76-8.
Dobranszki J, Magyar-Tabori K, Jambor-Benczur E, Lazanyi J, Buban T, and Szalai J, 2000c. Influence of aromatic cytokinins on shoot multiplication and their post-effects on rooting of apple cv. Husveti rozmaring. International Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology 6: 84-7.
Dobranszki J and Teixeira da Silva JA, 2010. Micropropagation of apple - A review. Biotechnology Advances 28: 462-488.
Gago J, Martinez-Nunez L, Landin M and Gallego PP, 2010. Artificial neural networks as an alternative to the traditional statistical methodology in plant research. Journal of Plant Physiology 167: 23-27.
Gallego PP, Gago J and Landin M, 2011. Artificial neural networks technology to model and predict plant biology process. In: Suzuki K (ed.). Artificial Neural Networks-Methodological and Biomedical Applications. Pp. 197-216. Intech Open Access Publisher, Croatia.
Geng F, Moran R, Day M, Halteman W and Zhang D, 2016. Increasing in vitro shoot elongation and proliferation of ‘G.30’ and ‘G.41’ apple by chilling explants and plant growth regulators. HortScience 51 (7): 899-904.
Ghanbari A, 2014. Impacts of plant growth regulators and culture media on in vitro propagation of three apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) rootstocks. Iranian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 3(1): 11-20.
Grigoriadou K, Leventakis N and Vasilakakis M, 2000. Effects of various culture conditions on proliferation and shoot tip necrosis in the pear cultivars ‘Williams’ and ‘Highland’ grown in vitro. Acta Horticulturae 520: 103-108.
Hemmaty H, Mohseni Azar M, Aghaii K, Dilmaghani MR and Manavi Fard M, 2014. Effect of explant and auxin type on embryogenic callus production and somatic embryogenesis induction in M.26 apple rootstock. Journal of Plant Productions 37(1): 1-10 (In Persian with English abstract).
Jalali Samghabadi S and Jalili Marandi R, 2015. Evaluation response of three apple rootstocks to drought stress in vitro. Journal of Plant Productions 38(3): 65-78 (In Persian with English abstract).
Karimpour S, Davarynejad GH, Tehranifar A and Bagheri A, 2013. Comparative effects of some PGRs combination on proliferation and hyperhydricity of Sebri pear cultivar. International Journal of Farming and Allied Sciences 2 (9): 202-205.
Karimpour S, Davarynejad GH, ZakiAghl M and Safarnejad MR, 2020. In vitro shoot proliferation of Pyrus communis cv. ʽShekariʼ in different medium nutrition by Design Expert. Journal of Horticultural Sciences 33 (4): 577-591.
Kaushal N, Modgil M, Thakur M and Sharma DR, 2005. In vitro clonal multiplication of an apple rootstock by culture of shoot apices and axillary buds. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 43: 561-5.
Korban SS and Chen H, 1992. Apple. In: Hammerschlag FA and Litz RE (eds). Biotechnology of Perennial Fruit Crops. Pp. 102-117. CAB International, Wallingfrod, UK.
Lane WD and McDougald JM, 1982. Shoot tissue culture of apple: comparative response of five cultivars to cytokinin and auxin. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 62: 689-694.
Magyar-Tabori K, Dobranszki J, Jambor-Benczur E, Buban T, Lazanyi J, Szalai J and Ferenczy A, 2001a. Post-effects of cytokinins and auxin levels of proliferation media on rooting ability of in vitro apple shoots (Malus domestica Borkh.) ‘Red Fuji’. International Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology 7: 26-29.
Magyar-Tabori K, Dobranszki J, Jambor-Benczur E, and Lazanyi J, 2001b. Role of cytokinins in shoot proliferation of apple in vitro. Analele Universitii din Oradea VII. Partea I, 17-24. Fascicula Agricultur Si Horticulture.
Magyar-Tabori K, Dobranszki J, Jambor-Benczur E, Lazanyi J, Szalai J and Ferenczy A, 2002. Effects of indole-3-butyric acid levels and activated charcoal on rooting of in vitro shoots of apple rootstocks. International Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology 8: 25-8.
Marin JA, Jones OP and Hadlow WCC, 1993. Micropropagation of columnar apple trees. Journal of Horticultural Science 68: 289-297.
Miri SM, 2018. Effect of IAA, IBA and NAA auxins on in vitro rooting of M.9 and M.26 apple rootstocks. Cellular and Molecular Plant Biology Journal 12(4): 15-23.
Modgil M, Sharma DR and Bhardwaj SV, 1999. Micropropagation of apple cv. Tydeman Early Worcester. Scientia Horticulturae 81: 179-188.
Murashige T and Skoog F, 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum 15: 473-497.
Niedz RP and Evens TJ, 2006. A solution to the problem of ion confounding in experimental biology. Nature Methods 3: 417. doi.org/10.1038/nmeth0606-417.
Niedz RP and Evens TJ, 2007. Regulating plant tissue growth by mineral nutrition. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology – Plant 43: 370-381.
Niedz RP, Hyndman SE and Evens TJ, 2007. Using a Gestalt to measure the quality of in vitro responses. Scientia Horticulturae 112: 349-359.
O'Herlihy EA, Croke JT and Cassells AC, 2003. Influence of in vitro factors on titre and elimination of model fruit tree viruses. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 72: 33-42.
Paprstein F, Sedlak J, Polak J, Svoboda L, Hassan M and Bryxiova M, 2008. Results of in vitro thermotherapy of apple cultivars. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 94: 347-352.
Pasqualetto PL, Zimmerman RH and Fordham IJ, 1988. The influence of cation and gelling agent concentrations on vitrification of apple cultivars in vitro. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 14: 31-40.
Reed BM, Wada S, DeNoma J and Niedz RP, 2013a. Improving in vitro mineral nutrition for diverse pear germplasm. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology – Plant 49: 343-355.
Reed BM, Wada S, DeNoma J and Niedz RP, 2013b. Mineral nutrition influences physiological responses of pear in vitro. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology – Plant 49: 699-709.
SAS Institute Inc., 1989. SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 6. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, USA.
Sharma M, Modgil M and Sharma DR, 2000. Successful propagation in vitro of apple rootstock MM106 and influence of phloroglucinol. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 38: 1236-1240.
Sharma T, Modgil M and Thakur M, 2007. Factors affecting induction and development of in vitro rooting in apple rootstocks. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 45: 824-829.
Singha S, Townsend E and Oberly G, 1990. Relationship between calcium and agar on vitrification and shoot-tip necrosis of quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.) shoots in vitro. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 23: 135-142.
Soni M, Thakur M and Modgil M, 2011. In vitro multiplication of Merton I. 793-an apple rootstock suitable for replantation. Indian Journal of Biotechnology 10(3): 362-368.
Thakur A and Kanwara JS, 2011. Effect of phase of medium, growth regulators and nutrient supplementations on in vitro shoot-tip necrosis in pear. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 39: 131-140.
Wada S, Maki Sh, Niedz RP and Reed BM, 2015. Screening genetically diverse pear species for in vitro CaCl2, MgSO4 and KH2PO4 requirements. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 37: 63. Doi. 10.1007/s11738-014-1754-y.
Wada S, Niedz RP, DeNoma J and Reed BM, 2013a. Mesos components (CaCl2, MgSO4, KH2PO4) are critical for improving pear micropropagation. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology – Plant 49: 356-365.
Wada S, Niedz RP and Reed BM, 2013b. Determining nitrate and ammonium requirements for optimal in vitro response of diverse pear species. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology – Plant 49: 356-365.
Ward SP and Leyser O, 2004. Shoot branching. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 7: 73-78.
Welander M, 1985. In vitro shoot and root formation in the apple cultivar Akero. Annals of Botany 55: 249-261.
Yepes LM and Aldwinckle HS, 1994. Micropropagation of thirteen Malus cultivars and rootstocks, and effect of antibiotics on proliferation. Plant Growth Regulators 15: 55-67.
Zimmerman RH and Fordham IM, 1985. Simplified method for rooting apple cultivars in vitro. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 110: 34-38.